Skip to content
Satz-Asbury Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Satz-Asbury Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$96kFood & Nutrition$53kAnimals$50kCivil Rights$50kHealth$45kEducation$44kEnvironment$27kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO FOODBANK$10,000
IDAHO VOICES FOR CHILDREN$7,000
YMCA$5,000
THE WATERSHED$3,000
CHANNEL ISLANDS MARINE AND WILDLIFE INSTITUTION$2,500
WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$2,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST$2,500
STORYTELLER CHILDREN'S CENTER$2,500
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$2,500
DIRECT RELIEF$2,500
ZOO BOISE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$500
FEED THE GAP$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 12%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS: $2k → 14%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS: $2k → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $2k → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $2k → 14%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS: $2k → 14%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS: $2k → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $2k → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $2k → 14%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $4k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $2k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $2k → 8%WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $1k → 8%Idaho Youth Ranch: $1k → 8%IDAHO YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 36 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
11

Total granted

$390k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +4%
  • BS
    Boise State University Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $34k · revenue +191%
  • IZ
    IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY COUNSELLING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • BW
    Boise WaterShed Exhibits Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wallowa Land Trust

Our mission is to protect the rural nature of Wallowa County by working cooperatively with private landowners,indigenous people, local communities and governmental entities to conserve land.

Environment
2
Sagebrush Steppe Land Trust Inc

Our mission is to protect, connect, and enhance wildlife habitat, working lands, and community spaces in southeast idaho, now and for future generations.

Environment
3
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
4
Idaho Science & Technology Charter

Public Education.

Education
5
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
6
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
7
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
8
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
9
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

—
10
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDAHO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $42,000 · OtherIDAHO VOICES FOR CHILDRENYMCA: $40,000 · OtherYMCACHANNEL ISLANDS MARINE AND WILDLIFE INSTITUTION: $12,500 · OtherCHANNEL ISLANDS MARINE AND WILDLIFE INSTITUTIONFaces of Hope: $10,500 · OtherAGENCY FOR NEW AMERICANS: $9,000 · OtherCALM: $8,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC: $8,500 · Other+25 more: $72,250 · Other+25 moreIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $50,000 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK…FEED THE GAP INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionBoise State University Foundation Inc: $34,000 · EducationBoise Stat…THE LITERACY LAB: $3,250 · EducationTHE LITERA…+1 more: $500 · EducationIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $34,000 · AnimalsIDAHO ZOOL…RETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $3,000 · AnimalsRETURN TO …Women's and Children's Alliance: $11,500 · Human ServicesWomen's an…UNITY SHOPPE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesUNITY SHOP…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $8,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC V…COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUT…TRICA INC: $18,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 · Arts & CultureGAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE OCEAN INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $2,500 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST OF THE TREASURE VALLEY: $1,000 · Environment
Other$210,250Food & Nutrition$52,500Education$37,750Animals$37,000Human Services$37,000Arts & Culture$20,000Environment$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $34,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $34,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTRICA INC: $18,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance: $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY SHOPPE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL: $6,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHEAL THE OCEAN INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LITERACY LAB: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE GAP INC: $2,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetWHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIdaho Trails Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLAND TRUST OF THE TREASURE VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Momentum Group Create Common Good: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeace Valley Charter School Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds GAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE OCEAN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY LAB ↗
  • Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE GAP INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…Laura Moore Cunningha…Santa Barbara Foundat…Idaho Power Foundatio…St Luke's Health Syst…Hutton Foundation Dba…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Four J FoundationPercival Stern Founda…Claude R & Ethel B Wh…Simplot Company Found…The Jean Sullivan (Wa…
Idaho Community Foundation IncID25.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Santa Barbara Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Four J Foundation · Percival Stern Foundation · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · The Jean Sullivan (Wareagle) Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Satz-Asbury Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Satz-Asbury Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Satz-Asbury Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home