· Private foundation
Satz-Asbury Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IDAHO FOODBANK | $10,000 |
| IDAHO VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $7,000 |
| YMCA | $5,000 |
| THE WATERSHED | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| DIRECT RELIEF | $2,500 |
| STORYTELLER CHILDREN'S CENTER | $2,500 |
| COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER | $2,500 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $2,500 |
| WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST | $2,500 |
| CHANNEL ISLANDS MARINE AND WILDLIFE INSTITUTION | $2,500 |
| WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE | $2,500 |
| ZOO BOISE | $2,000 |
| WASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS | $500 |
| FEED THE GAP | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +4%
- IZIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC5× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +31%
- BSBoise State University Foundation Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $34k · revenue +191%
Funded once
- CCCOMMUNITY COUNSELLING CENTERone grant, 2022 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $2k
- LTLAND TRUST OF THE TREASURE VALLEYone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to protect the rural nature of Wallowa County by working cooperatively with private landowners,indigenous people, local communities and governmental entities to conserve land.
Our mission is to protect, connect, and enhance wildlife habitat, working lands, and community spaces in southeast idaho, now and for future generations.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Public Education.
Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
Provide food for individuals in need
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Youth Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Community Counseling Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TRICA INC ↗
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds GAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE OCEAN INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds STORYTELLER CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY LAB ↗
- Who funds RETURN TO FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds FEED THE GAP INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Santa Barbara Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Four J Foundation · Percival Stern Foundation · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · The Jean Sullivan (Wareagle) Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Satz-Asbury Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.