Skip to content
Sarkeys Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Sarkeys Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
119
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$6.0MHealth$5.6MEducation$2.5MHousing & Shelter$1.0MCrime & Legal$678kYouth Development$566kPhilanthropy$451kFood & Nutrition$367kOther$0
02FY2024 · 119 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k82 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$126M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME INTEGRATION INC$250,000
CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC$228,000
DEAN A MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE$200,000
OKLAHOMA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OU HEALTH (DBA OF OU MEDICINE INC)$125,000
GATEWAY TO PREVENTION AND RECOVERY$125,000
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION$105,000
UNIVERSITY OF TULSA$105,000
GRAND LAKE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC (DBA GRAND MENTAL HEALTH)$100,000
THE GENESIS PROJECT$100,000
THE SPRING SHELTER INC$75,000
MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA$75,000
HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC$62,500
EAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$62,500
SPECIAL CARE INC$62,500
THE VIRTUE CENTER$62,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ROGERS COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES INC: $45k → 10%WESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $56k → 15%MADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $49k → 16%CARE CENTER - CHILD ABUSE RESPONSE AND EVALUATION: $250k → 16%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $50k → 18%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $250k → 19%CARE CENTER - CHILD ABUSE RESPONSE AND EVALUATION: $250k → 16%CHRISTIAN HELPING HANDS OF COMANCHE INC: $40k → 19%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $35k → 14%WESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $35k → 15%CARE CENTER - CHILD ABUSE RESPONSE AND EVALUATION: $250k → 16%THE CARE CENTER: $50k → 16%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $250k → 19%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $250k → 19%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 16%HOME INTEGRATION INC: $250k → 19%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $50k → 9%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $50k → 9%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 16%CENTER OF FAMILY LOVE: $50k → 9%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $40k → 13%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $55k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 16%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 16%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $100k → 15%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $75k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $50k → 15%DAYSPRING VILLA WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S SHELTER INC: $50k → 15%SISU YOUTH INC: $63k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $63k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $63k → 16%SISU YOUTH INC: $63k → 16%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $228k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $228k → 15%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED INC: $40k → 16%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $228k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $100k → 15%PIVOT INC: $50k → 16%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $50k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $63k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $50k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $45k → 16%SPECIAL CARE: $50k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $50k → 16%SPECIAL CARE: $50k → 16%ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%CITY CARE: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 141 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

141 repeat relationships: 68 still active in FY2024, 73 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

141
83

Total granted

$15M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+8%

Still filing today

92%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center
    4× · 2021–2024 · $800k · revenue +3%
  • The University of Tulsa
    4× · 2021–2024 · $526k · revenue +6%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $406k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -1%
  • COMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -12%
  • WF
    WOODWARD FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +346%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Southern Oklahoma Inc

Solicit, train & direct activities of court-appointed volunteer advocates for children in cases involving child abuse and neglect. assist in direct expense needs of individual children in court-appointed cases.

Civil Rights
2
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
3
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
4
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
5
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
6
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
7
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
8
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
9
Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral Association Inc

Our Mission is for all Oklahoma families to have access to quality care and education for their children through community-based resource and referral services; with a vision of Oklahoma communities supporting the development and learning…

—
10
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
11
Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers

Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers, Inc. serves the community behavioral health needs of nine counties of Southern Oklahoma. Lighthouse offers integrated care through their outpatient and Health Home programs to adults and children.…

Health
12
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Five Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Texoma Autism and Behavior Intervention School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 272 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
227/234
Grantees still filing
140/234
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOME INTEGRATION INC: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesHOME INTEGRATION INCCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $800,000 · Human ServicesCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluat…CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $684,000 · Human ServicesCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INCSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $305,000 · Human ServicesSISU YOUTH INC: $250,500 · Human Services+63 more: $3,937,600 · Human Services+63 moreGATEWAY TO PREVENTION & RECOVERY: $500,000 · OtherGATEWAY TO PREVENTION & RECOVERYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200,000 · OtherTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $169,000 · OtherGROUND ZERO EMERGENCY TRAINING CENTER FOUNDATION: $187,500 · Other+75 more: $3,961,400 · Other+75 moreDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE: $650,000 · HealthDEAN MCGEE EYE …Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $406,000 · HealthOklahoma Medica…Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $275,000 · HealthMental Health A…Norman Alcohol Information Center Inc: $250,000 · HealthNorman Alcohol …HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $162,500 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE M…BETHESDA INC: $125,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $100,000 · Health+11 more: $485,000 · Health+11 moreThe University of Tulsa: $526,400 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation: $100,000 · EducationTEXOMA AUTISM AND BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION SCHOOL: $82,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC: $75,000 · EducationJUBILEE PARTNERS ASSOCIATION: $65,000 · EducationMcCalls Chapel School Inc: $50,000 · EducationGREAT EXPECTATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · Education+4 more: $99,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $383,907 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $300,000 · PhilanthropyTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC: $120,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $90,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $150,000 · Crime & LegalREMERGE INC: $132,500 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $90,000 · Crime & LegalOklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy: $70,000 · Crime & Legal1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION PROGRAM INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalOKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalEXCHANGE CLUB CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE OF OKLAHOMA INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF OTTAWA COUNTYINC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalTULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN: $30,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more: $70,000 · Crime & LegalFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $150,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $110,000 · Housing & ShelterTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterREVITALIZE T-TOWN: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$6,977,100Other$5,017,900Health$2,453,500Education$1,042,400Philanthropy$923,907Crime & Legal$752,500Housing & Shelter$465,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOME INTEGRATION INC: $1,000,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $800,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $684,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE: $650,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $526,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY TO PREVENTION & RECOVERY: $500,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $406,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION: $383,907 over 4y, 23% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $305,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $275,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $250,500 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetNorman Alcohol Information Center Inc: $250,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $225,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetGROUND ZERO EMERGENCY TRAINING CENTER FOUNDATION: $187,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $169,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $162,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $162,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFOOD AND SHELTER INC: $150,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $150,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetThe Center of Family Love: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ANNA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetREMERGE INC: $132,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $130,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBETHESDA INC: $125,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetTHE GENESIS PROJECT: $125,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetTEEN RECOVERY SOLUTIONS INC: $120,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $115,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $110,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $105,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $105,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA: $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $100,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $95,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetSAFENET SERVICES INC: $94,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWESTERN PLAINS YOUTH AND FAMILY INC: $91,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHealth Alliance for the Uninsured: $90,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATI: $90,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INC: $88,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $85,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFostering Futures Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 12% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…El and Thelma Gaylord…Oklahoma City Communi…Communities Foundatio…Inasmuch FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…Wegener Foundation IncHarris Foundation IncKirkpatrick Family Af…The Gelvin FoundationArvest FoundationLove Meyer Family Fou…
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK176.7× affinity98 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Inasmuch Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sarkeys Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sarkeys Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 800%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Crossroads Youth & Family Services Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Big Five Community Services Inc: 75% of income from government
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Oklahoma County Diversion Hub Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Northwest Domestic Crisis Services: 11% of income from government
  • Thunderbird Clubhouse Board Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Food and Shelter Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Gateway to Prevention & Recovery: 6% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Community Crisis Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Dean Mcgee Eye Institute: 1% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
80get no government money at all
93report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 272 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $4.4M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sarkeys’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home