Skip to content
Saraiya Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Saraiya Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$276kReligion$53kEducation$47kHealth$22kCrime & Legal$20kYouth Development$11kInternational$9kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION$50,000
VYO-USA INC$11,000
PUSHTI MARGIYA VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF NORTH A$8,000
SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC$6,100
INDUS EDUCATIONAL AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDA$5,000
VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA$5,000
SHRI SANATANA DHARMA MANDIR INC$2,500
HINDU ACTION$1,000
HINDU UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$1,000
SHRUTI FOUNDATION$500
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$500
MT KAILASH FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC: $6k → 8%GKHET INC: $5k → 12%HINDU FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $2k → 13%MT KAILASH FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 13%MT KAILASH FOUNDATION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$391k · 10 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$391k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
0%

Still filing today

60%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHealthFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +79%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $46k · revenue +34%
  • IE
    INDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • SA
    SOUTH ASIAN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • TF
    THE FLORIDA MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION OF CARING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -20%
  • GI
    GKHET INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
2
Sindhi Association of North America
—
3
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
4
University of Spiritual Research
Religion
5
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh U S a Inc

The Mission of the Hindu Swayaamsevak Sangh USA, Inc. is: * to give primacy to Humanitarian and Spiritual values of life; * to create and promote a better understanding and more friendly relationship between races, nations and through…

—
7
Swami Dayanand Education Foundation
Education
8
Hindu Center of Atlanta Inc

To serve atlanta area hindu community to celebrate hindu culture

Religion
9
International Hindu University Inc

Our mission as per the by-laws : a) the board adopts a strategic plan that includes goals which will lead to acquiring accreditation recognized by us department of education and maintaining it. this includes getting an accreditation from…

Religion
10
Sadvidya Foundation

Education

Religion
11
Sahayog Foundation
Community Improvement
12
Adhyatmik Foundation Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hindu American Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mt Kailash Preparatory Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $275,000 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $2,970 · Arts & CulturePUSHTI MARGIYA VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA: $40,800 · OtherPUSHTI MARGIYA VAISHN…SOUTH ASIAN LEGAL DEFENSE FUND: $20,000 · OtherSOUTH ASIAN LEGAL DEF…VYO-USA INC: $11,500 · OtherVYO-USA INCVISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · OtherVISHWA HINDU PARISHAD…SHRI SANATANA DHARMA MANDIR INC: $3,500 · Other+6 more: $4,750 · Other+6 moreEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $45,500 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA…INDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalINDUS EDUCATIO…PARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · InternationalSewa International Inc: $6,100 · Human ServicesGKHET INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHindu Family Support Services Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesMT KAILASH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE FLORIDA MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION OF CARING INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · HealthAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $1,000 · Food & NutritionVYO USA INC: $500 · Religion
Arts & Culture$277,970Other$85,550International$57,500Human Services$13,600Health$5,500Food & Nutrition$1,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $275,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $45,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINDUS EDUCATION AND EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FLORIDA MEDICAL CLINIC FOUNDATION OF CARING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGKHET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHINDUACTION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPARAM SHAKTI PEETH OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHindu Family Support Services Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHindu University of America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMT KAILASH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSHRUTI FOUNDATION INC: $970 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetVYO USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aggarwal & Gupta Fami…Verizon FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INCFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aggarwal & Gupta Family Foundation INC · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saraiya Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saraiya Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saraiya Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home