Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sara & Robert Savage Charitable Foundation U/A/D 12-28-2004

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2020
30
Grants FY2020
9
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of Sara & Robert Savage Charitable Foundation U/A/D 12-28-2004’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Brown University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Sara & Robert Savage Charitable Foundation U/A/D 12-28-2004 named its own grantees at scale: 21 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

27
17
24
18
24
19
21
20
13
21
10
22
6
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$5.6MEducation$1.2MHuman Services$129kInternational$87kArts & Culture$83kEnvironment$56kRecreation & Sports$26kYouth Development$23kHealth$18kOther$2.2M
02FY2020 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k22 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$22k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Volunteer Match$1,000,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$300,000
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai$200,000
Taft School Annual Fund$50,000
Speak Up Africa$30,000
Pilobolus Inc$25,000
ASAP$15,000
NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL$10,000
Third Option Foundation$5,000
Warren Land Trust Inc$5,000
PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE$5,000
Steep Rock Association$5,000
LAKE WARAMAUG ASSOCIATION$4,000
KING ANNUAL FUND$2,500
Hudson River Park Friends$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Third Option Foundation: $5k → 6%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $1k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $1k → 9%Mount Sinai Health System: $110k → 17%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $1k → 9%SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT: $1k → 9%Mount Sinai Health System: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MT
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 40 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2020, 13 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
16

Total granted

$3.7M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+52%

Still filing today

70%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
EnvironmentHealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    5× · 2018–2022 · $979k · revenue +52%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $120k · revenue +90%
  • NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2022 · $110k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SPENCE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • CS
    City Squash Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oliver Scholars Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compass Zambia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Pregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Dance Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr18%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr18%1%20–35yr14%2%35–55yr18%94%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
10%
646/6,364

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
32/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,580,250 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITYVolunteer Match — $1,500,000 · OtherVolunteer MatchTaft School Annual Fund — $425,000 · OtherTaft School Annual FundASAP — $125,000 · OtherASAP+40 more — $182,865 · Other+40 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $979,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL …NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL — $110,000 · EducationNOBLE AND GRE…UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $11,500 · EducationMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $4,000 · Human ServicesSPEAK UP AFRICA INC — $75,000 · InternationalCOMPASS ZAMBIA — $5,550 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 · International+2 more — $1,750 · InternationalPILOBOLUS INC — $77,500 · Arts & CultureFERRODONNA FEATURES INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureSTEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentWARREN LAND TRUST INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE LAKE WARAMAUG ASSOCIATION INC — $7,000 · EnvironmentLAKE WARAMAUG TASK FORCE INC — $5,500 · EnvironmentNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $4,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $3,200 · Environment+2 more — $1,500 · Environment
Community Improvement$5,580,250Other$2,232,865Education$1,150,500Human Services$129,000International$86,800Arts & Culture$83,000Environment$56,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,580,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $979,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $120,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL — $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPILOBOLUS INC — $77,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSPEAK UP AFRICA INC — $75,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPLAY RUGBY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWARREN LAND TRUST INC — $15,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetYELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPENCE SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health — $9,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAKE WARAMAUG ASSOCIATION INC — $7,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetCOMPASS ZAMBIA — $5,550 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetLAKE WARAMAUG TASK FORCE INC — $5,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERRODONNA FEATURES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCity Squash Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $3,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $2,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLIVER SCHOLARS PROGRAM INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT LYME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRADICAL HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRwanda One Hill At A Time Inc — $750 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $565 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON'S DISEASE SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIVERSITY OF DANCE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROXBURY LAND TRUST INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDEN AUTISM SERVICES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIFE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds PILOBOLUS INC
  • Who funds SPEAK UP AFRICA INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC
  • Who funds STEEP ROCK ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PLAY RUGBY INC
  • Who funds WARREN LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE CLUB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SPENCE SCHOOL
  • Who funds Physicians For Reproductive Health
  • Who funds THE LAKE WARAMAUG ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds COMPASS ZAMBIA
  • Who funds LAKE WARAMAUG TASK FORCE INC
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds FERRODONNA FEATURES INC
  • Who funds City Squash Inc
  • Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WARREN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

FjcNY26.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fjc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · The Kestrel Foundation · Murray & Susan Haber Charitable Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Dungannon Foundation Inc · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation · Charles & Jane Klein Family Fund · The Wenden Foundation · S & L Marx Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sara & Robert Savage Charitable Foundation U/A/D 12-28-2004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Steep Rock Association Inc19% of income from government
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc9% of income from government
  • Greenwoods Counseling & Referrals Inc7% of income from government
  • Pilobolus Inc1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Eden Autism Services Inc0% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph