· Private foundation
Sanjay and Durga Reddy Konda Founda
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $3k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAJA BAHADUR VENKATA RAMA REDDY | $174,550 |
| SEWA INTERNATIONAL USA | $15,000 |
| INDO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION | $1,100 |
| JERSEY VILLAGE HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $177k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISewa International Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +101%
- TDTELANGANA DEVELOPMENT FORUM USA4× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +209%
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA4× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- RERBVRR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION INDIAone grant, 2023 · $25k
- RJReddy Jana Sangha Foundation USA2× · 2017–2018 · $24k
- OUOsmania University Alumni Association Inc USAone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Formed in 1993, the Classical Arts Society of Houston is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting and maintaining the rich heritage of the classical performing arts of India. In particular, the organization presents South Indian…
The nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;telangana nbsp;peoples nbsp;associatiom nbsp;of nbsp;dallas nbsp;(tpad) nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;conduct nbsp;telengana nbsp;( nbsp;a nbsp;region nbsp;in nbsp;india) nbsp;festivals nbsp;and nbsp;events nbsp;like…
To encourage cooperation between the usa and india and advance the shared values of democracy, inclusive economic development and mutual respect.
Cultural development and charity work for the state of telangana
The Foundation is a philanthropic foundation focused on alleviating poverty. It is focused on providing world-class educational opportunities to economically and socially disadvantaged gifted children from impoverished rural backgrounds in…
MISSION STATEMENT * To create a literary forum to encourage creative literary activity recognize authors and publish their work to organize literary symposiums and to foster exchange of ideas. * To promote performing arts classical music…
Help poor students in education.
GHHF has 175 Sunday School centers India .Grants were give for education, reconstruction and renovation of Hindu Temples. Provided vocational training for underpriviledged. Provided free meals to needy. Flood relief, medicines and baby…
The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friendswood Isd Education Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hps Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
- Who funds Osmania University Alumni Association Inc USA ↗
- Who funds TELUGU BHAVAN INC ↗
- Who funds TELANGANA DEVELOPMENT FORUM USA ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Social Service International Inc ↗
- Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds TELANGANA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER HOUSTONTAGHIN ↗
- Who funds HARICHAND EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE LPGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDO-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DESIGN OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDSWOOD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Hps Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baker Hughes Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sanjay and Durga Reddy Konda Founda funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.