Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sandy Fam Community Char Found Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$166kHealth$92kReligion$40kYouth Development$30kArts & Culture$21kCrime & Legal$10kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ALLIANCE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THE$10,000
BRIGHT FUTURES OF JOPLIN$10,000
EVERY TRIBE & EVERY TONGUE$10,000
STAINED GLASS THEATRE JOPLIN$10,000
CROSSLINES MINISTRIES OF JOPLIN$10,000
COMMUNITY CLINIC OF JOPLIN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WATERED GARDENS: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 9 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$329k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI
    5× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +83%
  • FS
    FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $47k · revenue +0%
  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN
    4× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • JC
    JASPER COUNTY CASA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lighthouse Shelter Inc

To decrease the incidence of domestic violence and sexual assault in saline county, missouri, through community awareness, counseling, shelter, direct services and support groups.

—
2
Mid-Ozark Casa Program

The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.

Community Improvement
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Southwest Missouri

Recruit, train and support community volunteers who assist the court in protecting the best interests of abused and neglected children in southwest missouri.

Civil Rights
4
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
5
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
6
Jackson County Casa

Casa is a unique non-profit helping abused and neglected children in the jackson county family court system. our team of trained volunteers,staff case supervisors, and staff attorneys allow each child to be represented in a court of law…

Civil Rights
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of Smith County

The children's advocacy center of smith county's mission is to protect and restore the lives of abused children through team investigations, healing services, community outreach and strategic partnerships.

Crime & Legal
8
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
9
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
11
Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri

Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services
12
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Self Help Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Every Tribe and Every Tongue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THE: $72,006 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF THECOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $55,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURIFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $47,006 · OtherFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INCBRIGHT FUTURES OF JOPLIN: $30,000 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURES OF JOPLINSTAINED GLASS THEATRE JOPLIN: $21,493 · OtherSTAINED GLASS THEATRE JOPLINIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROSSLINES MINISTRIES OF JOPLIN: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN: $47,005 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHWEST MISS…CARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC: $16,493 · HealthCARTHAGE …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,253 · HealthST JUDE C…EVERY TRIBE AND EVERY TONGUE: $30,000 · ReligionJASPER COUNTY CASA: $10,000 · Crime & LegalWATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$255,505Recreation & Sports$47,005Health$31,746Religion$30,000Crime & Legal$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $55,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetFAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC: $47,006 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN: $47,005 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetEVERY TRIBE AND EVERY TONGUE: $30,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCARTHAGE CRISIS CENTER INC: $16,493 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJASPER COUNTY CASA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,253 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERED GARDENS RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities · Arvest Foundation · Carthage Area United Way · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · MHM Support Services · The Sunderland Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandy Fam Community Char Found Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandy Fam Community Char Found Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sandy Fam Community Char Found Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph