Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sandra N Tillotson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$167kEnvironment$69kHealth$55kInternational$30kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$10kPhilanthropy$10kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$754k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NU SKIN FORCE FOR GOOD FOUNDATION$15,000
SEACOLOGY$15,000
WATERFORD SCHOOL$5,000
RISING STAR OUTREACH$5,000
DAYS FOR GIRLS$5,000
JOSEPHY CENTER FOR ARTS AND CULTURE$1,000
KAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS: $10k → 17%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $15k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $10k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $10k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$331k · 13 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$331k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+63%

Still filing today

69%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NU SKIN FORCE FOR GOOD FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +21%
  • RS
    Rising Star Outreach Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue +96%
  • DF
    Days For Girls International
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • OR
    OUR RESCUEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +58%
  • GF
    GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +70%
  • MC
    MAUI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
2
Karuna Foundation

Making distributions to individuals and organizations that advocate for and/or support the wellbeing of animals, our natural environment and all global citizens, particularly by addressing humanitarian crises or deficiencies in nutrition…

Animals
3
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
4
Honu Project

Wildlife and Habitat Conservation currently focusing on sea turtle conservation in Hawaii and throughout the world. Promoting the conservation of sea turtles and other wildlife and their habitats through educational activities and direct…

Unclassified
5
International Elephant Foundation

International Elephant Foundation (IEF) creates a sustainable future for elephants. We generate and effectively invest resources to support elephant conservation, education, research, and management programs worldwide. Through our passion,…

Animals
6
Hospital De La Familia Foundation

Delivering life changing care in rural Guatemala through a regional eye center, general medical and surgical care, maternal health and child nutrition programs.

International
7
Kukio Hoomana Fund

The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…

Philanthropy
8
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc

The Fossey Fund is dedicated to the conservation and study of gorillas in Africa through a successful, people-centered approach: 1) Providing daily protection to gorillas, 2) Scientific research providing critical data on gorillas and…

—
9
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
11
International Humanity Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Global Foundation for Oceanographic & Atmospheric Research Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kauai Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nu Skin Force for Good Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEACOLOGY: $69,391 · OtherSEACOLOGYTHE WATERFORD SCHOOL: $31,000 · OtherTHE WATERFORD SCHOOLMAUI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherMAUI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCANGUS DEI FOUNDATION AND LAMB OF GOD MATERNITY HOME: $5,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANK: $5,000 · Other+7 more: $11,600 · Other+7 moreTHE NU SKIN FORCE FOR GOOD FOUNDATION: $131,000 · EducationTHE NU SKIN FORCE FOR GOOD FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · EducationRising Star Outreach Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesRising Star Outrea…GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL FUND FOR WI…Days For Girls International: $25,000 · InternationalOUR RESCUE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJosephy Center for Arts and Culture: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureHAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $2,000 · AnimalsKAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsHINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT: $3,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$131,991Education$131,500Human Services$60,000International$25,000Arts & Culture$15,500Health$5,000Animals$4,000Crime & Legal$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NU SKIN FORCE FOR GOOD FOUNDATION: $131,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSEACOLOGY: $69,391 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetDays For Girls International: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetJosephy Center for Arts and Culture: $5,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAXVILLE HERITAGE INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NU SKIN FORCE FOR GOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEACOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Rising Star Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WIDOWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Josephy Center for Arts and Culture ↗
  • Who funds HAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HINDU HERITAGE ENDOWMENT ↗
  • Who funds Namahana Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds KAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAXVILLE HERITAGE INTERPRETIVE CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandra N Tillotson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandra N Tillotson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center: 100% of income from government
  • Josephy Center for Arts and Culture: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sandra N Tillotson’s filings →

More from the funding graph