· Private foundation
Sanders Tech-Ed Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION | $6,200 |
| AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| VETERANS ASSOCIATION NORTH COUNTY | $5,000 |
| RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION OF CARLSBAD BY THE SEA INC | $5,000 |
| VETERANS ASSOCIATION NORTH COUNTY | $5,000 |
| STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION OF CARLSBAD BY THE SEA INC | $3,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| CARLSBAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PARTNERS IN EDUCATION | $2,500 |
| TURNING POINT USA INC | $2,000 |
| CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY - SAN ANTONIO | $2,000 |
| AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORTH COAST | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +176%
- VAVETERANS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH COUNTY8× · 2018–2025 · $86k · revenue +286%
- RARESIDENTS ASSOC OF CARLSBAD BY THE SEA9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- SASISU ACADEMYone grant, 2018 · $5k
NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -41%- CFCARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Carlthorp school is an independent, nonprofit day school for children in grades k-6. carlthorp school provides a strong academic foundation in a diverse and nurturing school community that emphasizes traditional values, disciplined work…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.
San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.
To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.
The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Junior league of san diego, inc. is part of an organization of women committed to promoting voluntarism, developing the potential of women and improving communities through the effective action and leadership of trained volunteers. jlsd…
The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…
To provide activities and experiences that enrich the lives of young people, inspiring and enabling them to reach their full potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Arlington Cal Ripken Babe Ruth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF NORTH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RESIDENTS ASSOC OF CARLSBAD BY THE SEA ↗
- Who funds THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARLSBAD CHAMBER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kids for Peace ↗
- Who funds LabRats San Diego ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE GRAND STRAND INC ↗
- Who funds Leap to Success ↗
- Who funds SOROPTIMIST OCEANSIDE CARLSBAD ↗
- Who funds UNITED CHARITABLE ↗
- Who funds SISU ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds Words Alive ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NORTH COAST ↗
- Who funds Junior League of Northern Virginia ↗
- Who funds A SENSE OF HOME ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR ↗
- Who funds FOR THEIR THOUGHTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds AUTISM TREE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Clemson Paw Partners ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sanders Tech-Ed Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.