Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sandelman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$726kReligion$210kPhilanthropy$187kEducation$153kHuman Services$83kInternational$70kYouth Development$35kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$79,010
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$25,000
RAMAH DAROM$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$18,000
RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$10,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$5,000
DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY$5,000
ANSHEI EMUNA CONGREGATION$5,000
BINA HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$3,600
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$3,000
NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $5k → 7%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $7k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 11%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
VA
MD
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 28 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
18

Total granted

$1.2M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+29%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DK
    DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +127%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +53%
  • EA
    EDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $38k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • GP
    Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
American Jewish University

American jewish university (aju) advances and elevates the jewish journey of individuals, organizations and our community through excellence in scholarship, teaching, engaged conversation, and outreach. aju is a thriving center of jewish…

Education
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
9
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
10
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Embrace Girls Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
25/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINE: $190,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICINEUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $130,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINEUNIV OF MIAMI SYLVESTER CANCER CENTER: $110,000 · OtherUNIV OF MIAMI SYLVESTER CANCER CENTERBNAI TORAH CONGREGATION: $102,476 · OtherBNAI TORAH CONGREGATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $53,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONANSHEI EMUNA CONGREGATION: $45,540 · OtherANSHEI EMUNA CONGREGATION+22 more: $179,980 · Other+22 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $185,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $163,152 · Community ImprovementBoca Raton R…+1 more: $900 · Community ImprovementDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $57,500 · EducationDONNA KLEI…EDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · EducationEDA AND CL…University of Chicago: $18,000 · EducationUniversity…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $14,400 · EducationGEORGETOWN…JEWISH NEWS SERVICE INC: $11,000 · EducationJEWISH NEW…+1 more: $2,980 · EducationADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $32,800 · Human ServicesFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $21,750 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association: $5,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $40,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $24,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · International+1 more: $1,800 · InternationalPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,800 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $1,040 · Health
Other$810,996Philanthropy$185,800Community Improvement$164,052Education$141,880Human Services$69,550International$68,800Health$55,840

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $185,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $163,152 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $57,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $32,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $24,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $21,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROPEL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EMBRACE GIRLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $14,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NEWS SERVICE INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $2,980 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYehudi Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJunior League of Boca Raton Inc: $900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA HELPING HANDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds EDA AND CLIFF VINER COMMUNITY SCHOLARS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PROPEL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE EMBRACE GIRLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NEWS SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Boca West Children's Foundation Fka Boca West Community Charitable Foundation · Janower Family Private Foundation · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sandelman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sandelman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sandelman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sandelman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sandelman’s filings →

More from the funding graph