Skip to content

· Public charity

San Marcos Lions International

To support community and international activities including providing resources to individuals who are blind or who have severe vision problems; provide scholarships to local area students; assist local charities in the continuation of their programs

$402k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$402kHuman Services$147kCivil Rights$114kYouth Development$56kRecreation & Sports$45kHealth$36kArts & Culture$24kFood & Nutrition$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $243,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $402,256 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $159,006 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$839k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES (SCHOLAR$59,500
SAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES (ENDOW)$30,000
CASA OF CENTRAL TEXAS$20,000
SCHOOL FUEL$12,500
CITY OF SAN MARCOS PARKS & RECREATI$12,500
SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
GREATER SAN MARCOS YOUTH COUNCIL$10,000
MISSION ABLE$10,000
HAYS COUNTY FOOD BANK$8,000
HAYS COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE BOARD$8,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
VFW POST 3413$7,500
MEDICAL EXPLORERS$7,000
CITY OF SAN MARCOS$6,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hays Caldwell Women's Center: $25k → 10%SCHOOL FUEL: $13k → 10%Redwood Community Center: $10k → 10%REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%Redwood Community Center: $10k → 10%REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 10%Greater San Marcos Youth Council: $9k → 10%Greater San Marcos Youth Council: $8k → 10%Hays Caldwell Women's Center: $6k → 10%Greater San Marcos Youth Council: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$752k · 10 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$752k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-37%

Still filing today

40%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA of Central Texas Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +41%
  • GS
    Greater San Marcos Youth Council Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $56k · revenue +148%
  • HW
    HAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER
    5× · 2019–2024 · $49k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCHOOL FUEL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SC
    SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • MS
    MERMAID SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
2
San Marcos Parent-Child Workshop

Cooperative pre-school serving 50+ families. family members participate in school operations and attend learning sessions

—
3
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
4
San Marcos Hays County Emergency Medical Services Incorporated

To keep communities healthy and strong by leveraging partnerships with local regional governments, area hospitals, and local health-care providers. To provide excellent patient care to local taxpayers.

—
5
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
6
Greater San Marcos Area Senior Asso

Provides services and programs for the San Marcos, Texas

Human Services
7
Healthy Families San Angelo

To enhance the ability of families to protect, nuture, and educate their children in the first five years of life and enable them to enter school ready to learn.

—
8
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
9
Hays County Brown Santa

Hays County Brown Santa is dedicated to supporting families in need during the holiday season through acts of kindness, volunteerism, and community-ensuring families in Hays County feel remembered, cared for, and valued.

Human Services
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
11
Homeless Outreach Mitigation and Emergency Center

to reach functional zero homelessness in Hays County through outreach case management direct aid and emergency response while maintaining the dignity of the people we serve

Human Services
12
Hunt County Kids Inc

We are a one hundred percent volunteer organization working to help meet the needs of underprivileged children in Hunt County Texas.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Able; the most unlike its peers is Books Are the Beginning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $339,600 · EducationSAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES INC+1 more: $10,000 · EducationCITY OF SAN MARCOS: $43,500 · OtherCITY OF SAN MARCOSSAN MARCOS CISD: $30,000 · OtherSAN MARCOS CISDSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $24,000 · OtherSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTERTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · OtherTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITYHCCADA: $12,000 · OtherSCHOOL FUEL: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherMERMAID SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,750 · OtherHays County Food Bank: $8,000 · OtherHAYS COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE BOARD: $8,000 · Other+7 more: $43,500 · Other+7 moreREDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesREDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTE…Greater San Marcos Youth Council Inc: $56,000 · Human ServicesGreater San Marcos Yout…HAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER: $49,000 · Human ServicesHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S C…SCHOOL FUEL DBA SCHOOL FUEL SAN MARCOS: $12,500 · Human ServicesSCHOOL FUEL DBA SCHOOL …CASA of Central Texas Inc: $114,000 · Civil RightsCASA of Centra…MISSION ABLE: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBOOKS ARE THE BEGINNING: $6,000 · International
Education$349,600Other$226,750Human Services$182,500Civil Rights$114,000Housing & Shelter$10,000International$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES INC: $339,600 over 5y, 68% of budgetCASA of Central Texas Inc: $114,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetREDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $65,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetGreater San Marcos Youth Council Inc: $56,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetHAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER: $49,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSCHOOL FUEL DBA SCHOOL FUEL SAN MARCOS: $12,500 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetMISSION ABLE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHays County Food Bank: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOOKS ARE THE BEGINNING: $6,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Central Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater San Marcos Youth Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL FUEL DBA SCHOOL FUEL SAN MARCOS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ABLE ↗
  • Who funds SAN MARCOS COMMUNITY AND POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hays County Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS ARE THE BEGINNING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Hays CountyTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Hays County · St David's Foundation · Emmett and Miriam McCoy Foundation · Carson Family Foundation · Ingram Family Foundation · The Burdine Johnson Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Marcos Lions International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Marcos Lions International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Marcos Lions International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph