Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Samuel H Krom Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$80kEducation$46kHealth$13kArts & Culture$12kPhilanthropy$5kYouth Development$5kRecreation & Sports$5kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$-7968
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
For Autistic Kids Foundation$3,400
CONGREGATION B'NAI TIKVAH$2,800
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPEN DOORS ORGANIZATION: $2k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $500 → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$169k · 16 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
6

Total granted

$169k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+47%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $12k · revenue +17%
  • FA
    FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • TL
    THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +61%
  • LT
    LANE TECH COMPUTER SCIENCE BOOSTER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SG
    SCHOLARSHIP GRANT ROBIN BRIDGES
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Jewish Day School

Cjds creates for its students a standard of excellence in both jewish and general studies. students develop a passion for learning and a strong sense of themselves as jews and as human beings. students are inspired to develop a strong…

Education
2
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
3
Chicago Jewish Day School Endowment Foundation

The foundation was established exclusively for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the chicago jewish day school.

Education
4
Jewish Community Centers of Chicago

JCC Chicago is building community, supporting individuals and families, and growing hope through Jewish connections for everyone.

Human Services
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
Lycee Francais de Chicago Inc

The Lycee Francais de Chicago, driven by our core values of respect, responsibility and the joy of learning, empowers students to grow into active global citizens.

Education
7
Students Run Chicago
Health
8
Chicago Free School

Chicago Free School provides pre-kindergarten through 8th grade instruction and support activities. The faculty consists of qualified indiviuals with the appropriate education and experiende to provide students with the education that…

Education
9
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

10
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Day School of Metropolitan Seattle

Jds is committed to providing an innovative academic program through a rigorous integrated, inquiry-based curriculum with general & judaic studies, empowering children to grow into capable, wise, and compassionate upstanders.

Education
12
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired and the most unlike its peers is Open Doors Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AM SHALOM — $29,350 · OtherAM SHALOMCONGREGATION BNAI TIKVAH — $23,800 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI TIKVAHTEMPLE SHOLOM OF CHICAGO — $22,200 · OtherTEMPLE SHOLOM OF CHICAGOIndividual grant recipient — $10,567 · OtherIndividual grant recipientU OF CHICAGO BUSINESS SCHOOL — $8,000 · OtherU OF CHICAGO BUSINESS SCHOOLHADASSAH — $5,000 · OtherLANE TECH COMPUTER SCIENCE BOOSTER — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+5 more — $7,000 · Other+5 moreFRIENDS OF JONES — $15,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF JONESTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO — $10,000 · EducationTHE LATIN SCHOOL O…CHICAGO CITY DAY SCHOOL — $5,500 · EducationCHICAGO CITY DAY S…FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION — $10,400 · PhilanthropyFOR AUTIS…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $5,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UN…HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $11,500 · Arts & CultureJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHamlin Park Association Inc — $4,500 · Recreation & SportsOpen Doors Organization — $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $900 · Human Services
Other$115,917Education$30,500Philanthropy$15,600Arts & Culture$11,500Youth Development$5,000Recreation & Sports$4,500Human Services$2,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF JONES — $15,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $11,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION — $10,400 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CITY DAY SCHOOL — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $5,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHamlin Park Association Inc — $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOpen Doors Organization — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JONES
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC
  • Who funds FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE LATIN SCHOOL OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds CHICAGO CITY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds Hamlin Park Association Inc
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds Open Doors Organization
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Samuel H Krom Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph