How much did SALVITTI FAMILY FOUNDATION IMA grant in FY2024?

Education$4.6MHealth$2.8MHuman Services$413kCrime & Legal$77kArts & Culture$40kPhilanthropy$28kPublic Benefit$15kRecreation & Sports$13kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$2.7M

02FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k46 grants · $130k
$10k–50k15 grants · $233k
$250k+3 grants · $2.3M

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$1,015,000
WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE$760,000
LEWIS KATZ SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$507,500
SHADYSIDE ACADEMY$30,000
WASHINGTON CITY MISSION$27,500
EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION$25,000
TRIPOLI FOUNDATION$25,000
SETON HILL UNIVERSITY$20,000
ROCKNE FUND$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND$10,000
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ST BENEDICT THE ABBOT CHURCH$10,000
P G LIGHT UP THE TREE INC$10,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL FUND$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $413k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 66 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

66 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$261k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+36%

Still filing today

32%

39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WA
WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON COLLEGE
6× · 2019–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +2%
EA
EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +449%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +23%

Funded once

WH
WASHINGTON HOSPITAL FDN
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -26%
WC
WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
one grant, 2019 · $48k
PS
PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

William Penn University

William penn university provides the opportunity for an educational experience with a focus on leadership, technology, and the quaker principles of simplicity, peace-making, intergrity, community and equality.

Education

Philadelphia University

To improve lives and provide students with exceptional value in 21st century professional education.

Education

Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education

Team Pittsburgh

Youth dek hockey league.

Recreation & Sports

Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.

Education

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

To provide financial support to upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.

Health

Pittsburgh Botanic Garden

Pittsburgh Botanic Garden inspires people to value plants, garden design and the natural world by cultivating plant collections of the Allegheny Plateau and temperate regions, creating display gardens, conducting educational programs and…

Youth Development

Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts

As the first art museum and school in the us, pafa celebrates the transformative power of art and art-making.

Education

Susquehanna University

Susquehanna university educates students for productive, creative and reflective lives of achievement, leadership, and service in a diverse, dynamic and interdependent world.

Education

William Peace University

Prepare students for careers in the organizations of tomorrow.

Education

University of Delaware

Instruction, research, and public services are the university's most significant activities.

—

Shadyside Hospital of Pittsburgh

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emmaus Community of Pittsburgh Inc and the most unlike its peers is Orchardview Stables. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

726/11,145

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/31

Grantees still filing

26/31

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$4,594,000Health$2,755,000Other$2,690,400Human Services$412,500Crime & Legal$77,000Arts & Culture$39,500Philanthropy$28,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Washington County Community FoundationPA32.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Washington County Community Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Eqt Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern · Equitrans Midstream Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · United Way of Washington County · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · Edward B Dunlap Jr Foundation · Brooks Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · Upmc Group

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SALVITTI FAMILY FOUNDATION IMA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 251439732 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Salvitti Family Foundation Ima?

Find your warmest path to Salvitti Family Foundation Ima through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SALVITTI FAMILY FOUNDATION IMA

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Salvitti Family Foundation Ima?

More from the funding graph

SALVITTI FAMILY FOUNDATION IMA

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

31 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Salvitti Family Foundation Ima?

More from the funding graph