Skip to content

· Private foundation

Salt of the Earth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$1.2MReligion$436kEducation$385kHuman Services$100kHealth$20kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$12kCrime & Legal$1k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD HOPE INTERNATIONAL INC$150,000
LINWOOD WESLEYAN CHURCH$100,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$50,000
CHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY INTERNATIONAL INC$50,000
KINGDOM WORKERS FOSTER SUPPORT PROGRAM$20,000
AMAZING DISCOVERIES$20,000
VOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN-ST PAUL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $10k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
MI
SD
CA
AZ
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Salt of the Earth Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Salt of the Earth Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 25% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 16 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$1.8M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+57%

Still filing today

44%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    World Hope International Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $950k · revenue +32%
  • CS
    CHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY INTERNATIONAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $205k · revenue +4%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • AB
    AVERA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TB
    THE BEACON
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • L
    LIFELIGHT
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Media Group

Hope media group's (hmg) mission is engaging people to love jesus, serve others, and spread hope.

Arts & Culture
2
Association for Biblical Higher Education

Abhe is the quality and credibility resource partner that connects efforts among christian postsecondary educational institutions and with others invested in serious bible learning that shapes a life of godly influence and service to the…

Education
3
Christian Heritage Broadcastinginc

Chb's (praisefm) vision is to see every tribe and nation experience jesus together. our mission is simple: together we help people discover and worship jesus. more than a radio station, praisefm is a place where passionate lovers of jesus…

—
4
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
5
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
6
Tabor College

Preparing people for a life of learning, work, and service for Christ and His kingdom.

Education
7
Explore God Network
—
8
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
9
World Christian Broadcasting Corporation

World christian broadcasting exists so that people in places best served by broadcast media become aware of the good news of jesus christ and want to know more. geographic areas that cannot be easily served by missionaries are a priority.

Arts & Culture
10
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
11
Christians for Biblical Equality

See schedule o.christians for biblical equality (cbe), www.cbeinternational.org, is a 501c3 nonprofit organization comprised of individuals, churches, colleges, seminaries, and organizations, representing more than 100 different…

—
12
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Hope International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

World Hope International Inc: $950,000 · InternationalWorld Hope International IncCHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $205,000 · InternationalCHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY INTERNATIONAL INCLINWOOD WESLEYAN CHURCH: $200,000 · OtherLINWOOD WESLEYAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $80,000 · OtherVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INCCELEBRATE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherCELEBRATE COMMUNITY CHURCHKINGDOM WORKERS FOSTER SUPPORT PROGRAM: $40,000 · OtherKINGDOM WORKERS FOSTER SUPPORT…VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH - SIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $20,000 · OtherAVERA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $32,400 · Other+4 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $260,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORT…Amazing Discoveries: $35,000 · EducationAmazing Discoverie…HOPE HARBOR: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $20,000 · Human ServicesJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $11,000 · ReligionTHE COMPASS CENTER: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
International$1,155,000Other$577,400Education$345,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Human Services$20,000Religion$11,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $950,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $260,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $205,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmazing Discoveries: $35,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE HARBOR: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJESUSONLINE MINISTRIES: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMPASS CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Hope International Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN - ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds Amazing Discoveries ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HARBOR ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds JESUSONLINE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE COMPASS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation IncSD13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Salt of the Earth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Salt of the Earth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Salt of the Earth Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Salt of the Earth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Salt of the Earth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph