Skip to content

· Public charity

Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$19MReligion$1.6MYouth Development$119kHousing & Shelter$80kCrime & Legal$71kHuman Services$66kInternational$17kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $2,418,031, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,539,741 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,121,710 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$435M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Saint Thomas Medical Partners$1,447,566
Saint Thomas Rutherford Foundation$887,549
THE JOURNEY HOME INC$50,000
INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE$16,666
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC$10,000
FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $278k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE SMILES: $13k → 4%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%END SLAVERY TENNESSEE: $15k → 14%HOPE SMILES: $11k → 4%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS OF TENNESSEE: $8k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS OF TENNESSEE: $8k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $6k → 14%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $6k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE INC: $100k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS FNDN: $20k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $10k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 15 repeat orgs$222k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$21M
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+16%

Still filing today

80%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    Saint Thomas Medical Partners
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10M · revenue +142%
  • ST
    SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +17% · 45% of their budget
  • ID
    INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • AH
    ALIVE HOSPICE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • DO
    DOORS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -38%
  • RC
    RUTHERFORD COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CLINIC INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee Health Care Association

To maintain high standards for nursing homes in the state of tennessee and to seek the solutions to problems common to members of the association.

—
2
Mental Health Cooperative Inc

Mental health cooperative inc. (mhc) provides integrated health services that include behavioral health care, primary health care, addiction services, and community-based care management. mhc also provides emergency psychiatric services…

Health
3
Nashville Cares

Nashville cares exists to end the hiv epidemic, promote comprehensive sexual health and end sexual health stigmatization and discrimination through prevention, education, treatment, support, advocacy, and strategic partnership.

Health
4
Westcare Tennessee Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
5
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
6
Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition

Tirrc is a statewide, immigrant and refugee-led collaboration. our mission is to build power, amplify our voices, and organize communities to advocate for our rights. our vision is a stronger, more inclusive tennessee where people of all…

Civil Rights
7
Agape House of Northwest Tennessee

Pregnancy testing, limited obstetrical ultrasounds, sti testing and treatment, and educational programs.

Health
8
Tennessee Homeless Solutions

To reduce homelessness and improve family stability by increasing housing resources, administration of hud-mckinney vento funds, and support services through collaborative efforts with partner organizations, when available.

Housing & Shelter
9
Nashville Safe Haven Family Shelter Inc

Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
10
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

—
11
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Thomas Rutherford Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Greenhouse Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Saint Thomas Medical Partners: $10,352,664 · HealthSaint Thomas Medical Partners+3 more: $284,666 · HealthSAINT THOMAS NETWORK: $4,819,793 · OtherSAINT THOMAS NETWORKSAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD FOUNDATION: $4,757,293 · OtherSAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD FOUNDATION+5 more: $177,344 · OtherALIVE HOSPICE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesGREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $75,000 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $57,918 · Human ServicesHOPE SMILES: $24,000 · Human ServicesANCORATN FKA END SLAVERY TENNESSEE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,250 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY: $119,000 · Youth DevelopmentDOORS OF HOPE: $25,000 · Crime & LegalTENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC: $24,333 · Crime & LegalKYMARI HOUSE INC: $22,000 · Crime & LegalInspiritus Inc: $15,000 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,183 · Philanthropy
Health$10,637,330Other$9,754,430Human Services$288,168Youth Development$119,000Crime & Legal$71,333Religion$15,000Philanthropy$10,183

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSaint Thomas Medical Partners: $10,352,664 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD FOUNDATION: $4,757,293 over 8y, 45% of budgetINTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC OF NASHVILLE: $220,166 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUTHERFORD CTY: $119,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $105,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $57,918 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC: $44,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDOORS OF HOPE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC: $24,333 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE SMILES: $24,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetKYMARI HOUSE INC: $22,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetRUTHERFORD COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CLINIC INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOS INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,604 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetANCORATN FKA END SLAVERY TENNESSEE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInspiritus Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN TENNESSEE INC: $12,240 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,183 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROGRAM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charity Circle of MurfreesboroTN28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charity Circle of Murfreesboro · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital · Saint Thomas West Hospital · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · United Way of South Central Tennessee · Nashville Predators Foundation · Christy-Houston Foundation Inc · Kharis Foundation · John D Floyd Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph