How much did JOHN D FLOYD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of JOHN D FLOYD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

springstudenteducational enrichmentenrichment experiencesexperiences childrenacademic sportssports leadership

2020

hurricanefinalpmtreliefadvocacygolfdisaster

2021

cancerchild abusecarehealtheducation childrenrutherfordlearning

2022

—

2023

music

2024

fallenlearningtrainingadults

2025

foodstudents

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k14 grants · $75k
$10k–50k13 grants · $213k
$50k–250k3 grants · $196k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER OF SMYRNA$76,000
SPECIAL KIDS$70,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$50,000
AMERICAN RED CORSS$30,000
TENNESSEE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY$30,000
BARNABAS VISION$25,000
LIBERTYS STATION$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB RUTHERFORD CO$15,000
CENTER FOR THE ARTS$15,000
UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL TN$15,000
MTSU FOUNDATION$12,500
SCHAEFER LEGACY PROJECT$10,000
LAST CALL 4 GRACE$10,000
MINDFUL CARE$10,000
CHARITY CIRCLE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $381k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 12%. 7% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.7M · 54 repeat orgs$647k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

54 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.7M

$491k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%

+4%

Still filing today

41%

21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TG
Tennessee Golf Foundation
5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +119%
GM
Greenhouse Ministries
3× · 2019–2022 · $150k · revenue +111%
BV
BARNABAS VISION
4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +257%

Funded once

MF
MTSU Foundation Weatherford Chair of Finance MTSU
one grant, 2019 · $100k
EC
EMERALD COAST CHILDRENS ADVOCACY
one grant, 2022 · $78k
M
MTCS
one grant, 2024 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

West Tennessee Family Solutions Inc

To provide the highest quality care and opportunities affording individuals with developmental disabilities to lead successful and fulfilling lives withing their communities

Health

Empower Tennessee

To promote independence for persons with disabilities and provide guidance, education, and advocacy.

Human Services

Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services

Tennessee Family Solutions Inc

Residential and support services to children and adults with severe and multiple disabilities

Health

Christ Led Communities Inc

To equip men to initiate and lead for christ in their homes, churches, communities and the marketplace.

—

Casa of the Tennessee Heartland Inc

Provide advocacy for abused and neglected children in juvenile court.

Civil Rights

East Tennessee Christian Home Inc

The Home was organized to provide for the health, welfare and benefit of children whose parents or guardians are unable to care for them. The Home offers residential care and onsite academic

Human Services

The Community Foundation of Greater

Together with our community and partners, we transform generosity into lasting change towards a prosperous and just chattanooga where all can thrive and achieve their full potential.

Philanthropy

Chattanooga Regional Homeless

To lead, coordinate, and strengthen efforts to reduce & end homelessness in southeast, tn.

Community Improvement

Hope House of Tennessee Inc

By creating a safe and structured two year residential program the Hope House of Tennessee will aim to equip and empower personal and educational growth economic self-sufficiency and a deeper understanding of Christs unconditional love.

Housing & Shelter

Christian Community Services Inc

To empower underserved families, through caring relationships, to achieve a legacy of social, spiritual, and economic self-sufficiency.

Human Services

The Caring Place

The organization is an ecumenical, christian non-profit organization dedicated to addressing the basic physical, spiritual, and social needs of the disadvantaged in bradley county, tennessee.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Middle and the most unlike its peers is Tennessee Golf Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

12%

700/5,890

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

37/38

Grantees still filing

28/38

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,185,500Human Services$439,100Health$374,000Arts & Culture$270,000Education$68,500Crime & Legal$31,250Religion$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of MiddleTN44.7× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Charity Circle of Murfreesboro · Memorial Foundation Inc · Christy-Houston Foundation Inc · United Way of South Central Tennessee · Nashville Predators Foundation · Adams Family Foundation II · The Sixteen Foundation · Jennings & Rebecca Jones Foundation Inc · Coggin Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN D FLOYD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TENNESSEE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +84% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 581480889 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TENNESSEE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John D Floyd Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to John D Floyd Charitable Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN D FLOYD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John D Floyd Charitable Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

JOHN D FLOYD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John D Floyd Charitable Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph