How much did Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

abusewellness diseasedisease preventionneedychildren

2020

mentalpoorwellness diseasedisease prevention

2021

poor

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250k+2 grants · $2.1M

$711,563

Median grant

States reached

$363M

Total assets

Largest grants

SAINT THOMAS MEDICAL PARTNERS$1,376,625
Saint Thomas Rutherford Foundation$711,563
INTERFAITH DENTAL$10,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS OF TENNESSEE$8,334

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $246k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$14M · 10 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$14M

$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%

+105%

Still filing today

90%

70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ST
SAINT THOMAS MEDICAL PARTNERS
5× · 2019–2023 · $7.3M · revenue +74%
ID
INTERFAITH DENTAL CLINIC
6× · 2018–2023 · $147k · revenue +34%
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY
5× · 2018–2022 · $94k · revenue +40%

Funded once

AH
ALIVE HOSPICE INC
one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +23%
DO
DOORS OF HOPE
one grant, 2022 · $25k
RC
RUTHERFORD COUNTY PRIMARY CARE CLINIC INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +105%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Trinity Health

Meeting the needs of the whole person through quality health care and health-related services.

Health

Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

Mercy Health Services Inc

Mercy health services, inc. reflects the love of jesus christ by providing quality healthcare to the insured and uninsured.

Health

Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

Hopehealth Inc

To provide primary medical care.

Health

Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—

Triad Adult & Pediatric Medicine Inc

Triad Adult and Pediatric Medicine provides the residents of Guilford County, NC with exceptional healthcare that is comprehensive and delivered with compassion and respect.

Health

Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion

Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides home care services to help patients maintain their independence and stay at home. It is a member of Covenant Health system.

Health

Health Services of North Texas Inc

Improving the quality of life for all north texans through medical care, support services and advocacy.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Thomas Rutherford Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hope Smiles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

14/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$7,543,439Other$6,377,676Human Services$245,668Youth Development$94,000Crime & Legal$21,000Religion$15,000Philanthropy$10,183

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of MiddleTN27.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle · Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital · Saint Thomas West Hospital · Charity Circle of Murfreesboro · The Healing Trust · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · United Way of South Central Tennessee · Nashville Predators Foundation · Memorial Foundation Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Second Harvest Food Bank of Middle Tn · The Minneapolis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Saint Thomas Rutherford Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~32 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 621167917 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Saint Thomas Rutherford Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 32 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 45% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital?

Find your warmest path to Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital?

More from the funding graph

Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital?

More from the funding graph