Skip to content
Sageview Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Sageview Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$405k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.2MHousing & Shelter$343kEducation$263kRecreation & Sports$123kHuman Services$116kFood & Nutrition$113kReligion$90kHealth$76kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $144k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $228k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION RWANDA$125,000
Hoag Charity Sports$52,500
Orange County Rescue Mission$50,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$25,875
Freedom Youth Foundation$20,000
Fidelity Charitable$20,000
IDT Ministries$15,000
Rise Against Hunger$12,749
PROVERBS 31 MINISTRIES$10,000
NORTHRISE UNIVERSITY$10,000
MILELE HOME INTERNATIONAL$10,000
BUILD A MIRACLE$10,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS GIRLS$10,000
SUNRIPE FARMS$7,412
FLATWATER FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Advisors Give Back: $1k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%FLATWATER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%C2ADOPT: $10k → 9%Generate Hope: $10k → 11%C2ADOPT: $5k → 9%C2ADOPT: $1k → 9%Generate Hope: $5k → 11%C2ADOPT: $500 → 9%C2ADOPT: $500 → 9%Generate Hope: $5k → 11%C2ADOPT: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Sageview Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 35%.

Sageview Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 38% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 35 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
26

Total granted

$2.2M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+29%

Still filing today

49%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    Orange County Rescue Mission Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $216k · revenue +26%
  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    5× · 2019–2024 · $161k · revenue +114%
  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $156k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • MI
    MAXIMUM IMPACT FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +183%
  • OT
    OUTSIDE THE BOWL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -28%
  • GO
    GRACE OPENS DOORS CHARITABLE FOUNDA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
2
Hope Worldwide Ltd

Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.

International
3
Habitat for Humanity Inc

Habitat seeks to eliminate poverty housing from the world and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
4
Relief International Inc

Relief international (ri) partners with communities impacted by conflict, climate change, and disaster to save lives, build greater resilience, and promote long-term health and wellbeing of people in the communities that we serve. relief…

International
5
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
6
Alliance for Hope International

To create pathways to hope for women, children, and men who are survivors of domestic violence and related sexual assault and child abuse through collaborative, integrative centers, teams and initiatives.

Philanthropy
7
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
8
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Hopeland

Hopeland pioneers innovative solutions and builds new partnerships to prevent family separation, reunify children who are separated from their families, and mobilize a movement of families to support children who are growing up outside of…

Human Services
11
The One Campaign

The ONE Campaign ("ONE") continued its work to educate and raise awareness among the public, media and policymakers around the world about the importance of official development assistance and international programs that (Continued on…

Unclassified
12
Possibilities Africa

To mobilize and equip christians to become agents of spiritual and socio-economic transformation in africa.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Many Hopes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
24/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION RWANDA: $571,147 · OtherSAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION RWANDANORTHRISE UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · OtherNORTHRISE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $104,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $57,000 · Other+41 more: $538,402 · Other+41 moreHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $160,875 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONALWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $156,321 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNA…Acts 4 Rwanda Inc: $83,800 · InternationalActs 4 Rwanda IncMANY HOPES INC: $45,000 · InternationalMANY HOPES INCHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONALRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $24,400 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $216,345 · Housing & ShelterOrange Cou…HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $21,150 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR …BUILD A MIRACLE: $35,450 · PhilanthropyMAXIMUM IMPACT FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $24,710 · Human ServicesGENERATEHOPE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOORDINATORS 2 INC: $17,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHOAG CHARITY SPORTS: $52,500 · Health+2 more: $1,652 · HealthFreedom Youth Foundation Inc: $20,000 · EducationCENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC: $10,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $5,000 · EducationGBOWEE PEACE FOUNDATION AFRICA-USA: $4,000 · Education
Other$1,505,749International$520,396Housing & Shelter$237,495Philanthropy$70,950Human Services$63,210Health$54,152Education$39,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc: $216,345 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $160,875 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $156,321 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetActs 4 Rwanda Inc: $83,800 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetHOAG CHARITY SPORTS: $52,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMANY HOPES INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetBUILD A MIRACLE: $35,450 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMAXIMUM IMPACT FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $30,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetHAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetPROVERBS 31 MINISTRY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $24,710 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $24,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $21,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Youth Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetGENERATEHOPE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCOORDINATORS 2 INC: $17,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTEAM AFRICA RISING INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUTSIDE THE BOWL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRIDGE2RWANDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONOLULU THEATRE FOR YOUTH: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGBOWEE PEACE FOUNDATION AFRICA-USA: $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBLUE SKY FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,554 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVISERS GIVE BACK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUP 15Q ALLIANCE: $98 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Acts 4 Rwanda Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOAG CHARITY SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds MANY HOPES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds BUILD A MIRACLE ↗
  • Who funds MAXIMUM IMPACT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVERBS 31 MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FLATWATER FOUNDATON ↗
  • Who funds RISE AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Freedom Youth Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GENERATEHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds COORDINATORS 2 INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM AFRICA RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTSIDE THE BOWL ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE2RWANDA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Enterprise Holdings F…Natl Christian Charit…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Raymond James Charita…American Endowment Fo…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sageview Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sageview Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Center for Child Counseling Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sageview’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home