Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Safty5 Foundation Gordon Owades Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$296kEmployment$169kInternational$136kHealth$36kHuman Services$28kArts & Culture$12kCommunity Improvement$8kHousing & Shelter$5kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$451k
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$447k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE$50,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$25,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$24,054
TEMPLE EMUNAH OF LEXINGTON$15,500
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
TEMPLE ISAIAH OF LEXINGTON$5,800
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$5,000
ITREK$5,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION$3,600
MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER$1,800
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$1,000
MAYO CLINIC$1,000
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPT FOUNDATION$1,000
US FRIENDS OF DROR ISRAEL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF PITTSBURGH: $1k → 11%MUJERES UNITAS Y ACTIVAS: $1k → 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $1k → 13%MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $2k → 20%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 9%AFFECT REAL CHANGE: $1k → 24%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $1k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $1k → 10%HOPE AND COMFORT: $200 → 7%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%JEFF'S PLACE: $100 → 8%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%JEFF'S PLACE: $100 → 8%RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%BEANTOWN BABY DIAPER BANK: $200 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METROWEST: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METROWEST: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METROWEST: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF METROWEST: $1k → 8%JEFF'S PLACE: $250 → 8%JEFF'S PLACE: $100 → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 8%METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND: $200 → 8%METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND: $100 → 8%IRISH INTERNATIONAL IMMIGRANT CENTER: $200 → 16%METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND: $100 → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $100 → 8%METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND: $50 → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
KY
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Safty5 Foundation Gordon Owades Trustee’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Safty5 Foundation Gordon Owades Trusteelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$720k · 41 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
96

Total granted

$720k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+37%

Still filing today

68%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $169k · revenue +104%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $76k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF THE BLUEGRASS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
2
United Jewish Federation of Northeastern New York Inc

To build / maintain a strong and united jewish community in order to ensure the continuity of the jewish people. the federation is the central agency for meeting jewish needs and articulating jewish concerns in the capital region, in…

Philanthropy
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
4
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
5
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
9
University of Massachusetts Amherst Foundation Inc

The university of massachusetts amherst foundation leads and supports private fund raising on behalf of the faculty, staff and students of the amherst campus. its volunteer board of directors provides leadership for the development of…

Education
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
12
Massachusetts Business Roundtable Inc

The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Metrowest Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Leslie St Fang Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…United Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportElementary Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Social ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Cancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr14%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr19%3%20–35yr14%10%35–55yr14%79%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/108
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,250

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/98
Grantees still filing
70/98
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $249,800 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INCIndividual grant recipient — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE ISAIAH OF LEXINGTON — $24,365 · OtherTEMPLE EMUNAH OF LEXINGTON — $22,040 · Other+85 more — $91,828 · Other+85 moreCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $255,000 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish Philanthropie…FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC+11 more — $16,336 · Philanthropy+11 moreJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $169,254 · EmploymentJEWISH VOCATIONA…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $75,960 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $31,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATION…ITREK INC — $15,000 · InternationalITREK INCBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · International+8 more — $8,693 · International+8 moreCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Health+13 more — $5,670 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,100 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesMujeres Unidas y Activas — $3,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesMERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC — $1,800 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $1,000 · Human ServicesAffect Real Change Inc — $1,000 · Human Services+9 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $1,020 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $250 · Arts & Culture
Other$468,033Philanthropy$296,336Employment$169,254International$135,653Health$35,670Human Services$28,400Arts & Culture$12,270

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $255,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $249,800 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC — $169,254 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $75,960 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetITREK INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPSTART BAY AREA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST TENNESSEINC STARKS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN KENTUCKY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARITAS COMMUNITIES INC — $4,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $3,493 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $3,035 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMujeres Unidas y Activas — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHaifa Foundation North America Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF PEACE OF MIND INC — $1,400 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLEXINGTON POLICE PATROLMAN'S ASSOCIATION — $1,100 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $1,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS — $1,020 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS IN NEED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAffect Real Change Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF DUVDEVAN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD PEOPLE FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LESLIE ST FANG FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON EATS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Phila…Eastern Bank Foundati…Cummings Foundation G…Boston Foundation IncMiddlesex Savings Cha…Highland Street Conne…Cambridge Savings Cha…Rockland Trust Charit…Richard & Susan Smith…Community Foundation …Eastern Cambridge Fou…Arbella Insurance Fou…
Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA34.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Boston Foundation Inc · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Richard & Susan Smith Family Foundation · Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Safty5 Foundation Gordon Owades Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
  • English at Large Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc — 39% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Three Bays Preservation Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Jewish Healthcare Center Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc — 13% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Care Central Vna & Hospice Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Open Table Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Arlington Eats Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Neighbors in Need Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Hope and Comfort Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines