Skip to content

· Public charity

Sabine Oaks Home

Home for the aged and terminally ill: See Schedule O

$490k
Granted FY2017
10
Grants FY2017
1
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $414k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Some Other Place Inc$105,000
Southeast Texas Food Bank$105,000
Nutrition and Services for Seniors$104,000
Family Services of Southeast Texas Inc$100,000
Humane Society of Southeast Texas$20,000
Habitat For Humanity of Jefferson County Inc$10,000
Anayat House Inc$10,000
Christian Life Crisis Intervention Inc$10,000
Texas Garden Clubs dba Beaumont Council of Garden Clubs$10,000
Richard L Shorkey Education & Rehab Center$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $309k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%Southeast Texas Food Bank: $105k → 19%Nutrition and Services for Seniors: $104k → 19%Family Services of Southeast Texas Inc: $100k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Hospitality House

Our mission is to meet the spiritual and practical needs of the families of prisoners. We strive to provide a safe and caring home in whichfamilies can rest while visiting loved ones currently incarcerated in the adjacent prison system.

—
2
Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana

Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance

Human Services
3
HomeAid Austin Inc

Engage in building procted to provide emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent housing while offering job skills training and support to help residents move toward self-sufficiency.

Employment
4
Habitat for Humanity Polk Co Tx Inc

To provide affordable housing for the poor.

—
5
Grace House Texarkana Inc

Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.

Housing & Shelter
6
Southeast Texas Hospice Foundation

Provide support for southeast texas hospice inc, a non-profit organization providing hospice services for the southeast texas area

—
7
East Texas Treatment Center

Treatment of physically handicapped

Health
8
Hospice of Texarkana Foundation

Established for the financial support of hospice of texarkana, inc.

Human Services
9
Healthy Family Services of Texas Inc

Healthy Family Services of Texas is dedicated to promoting the physical, mental, and emotional health of our patients by offering comprehensive healthcare services and wellness programs.

Health
10
Abigail's Place

Committed to supporting displaced single mothers in Fort Bend County by providing housing assistance and wraparound services.

Housing & Shelter
11
Texas Low-Income Housing Information Service

Our mission is to support low-income Texans efforts to achieve the American dream of a decent, affordable home in a quality neighborhood. We believe that Texas critical low-income housing and community development needs can best be solved…

Housing & Shelter
12
Habitat for Humanity Abilene Inc

Construct and/or rehabilitate houses for sale to low- and moderate-income families who qualify for home ownership. Homes are sold for an affordable mortgage.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Southeast Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christian Life Crisis Intervention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Some Other Place: $105,000 · Human ServicesSome Other PlaceSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $105,000 · Human ServicesSoutheast Texas Food Bank IncNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $104,000 · Human ServicesNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORSFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INCTEXAS GARDEN CLUBS: $10,000 · OtherChristian Life Crisis Intervention Inc: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherHumane Society Of Southeast Texas: $20,000 · AnimalsAnayat House Inc: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterRICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $10,000 · Health
Human Services$414,000Other$30,000Animals$20,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSome Other Place: $105,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $105,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTEXAS GARDEN CLUBS: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetChristian Life Crisis Intervention Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAnayat House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetRICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mildred Yount Manion Charitable FoundationTX15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation · Mechia Foundation · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · United Way of Mid & South Jefferson Co · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sabine Oaks Home funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sabine Oaks Home. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sabine Oaks Home?

    Find your warmest path to Sabine Oaks Home through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sabine Oaks Home’s filings →

    More from the funding graph