Skip to content
Plinth
Ask
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS

TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS (Texas) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $10,000 to it, the largest being Sabine Oaks Home ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$71k
Revenue FY2022
1
Funders on record
$10k
Grants received
$0
Net assets
0/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($249k) Expenses 100 ($346k) Net assets 100 ($954k)2018 Revenue 90 ($225k) Expenses 84 ($290k) Net assets 93 ($888k)2019 Revenue 85 ($212k) Expenses 79 ($275k) Net assets 86 ($825k)2020 Revenue 73 ($182k) Expenses 73 ($253k) Net assets 79 ($754k)2021 Revenue 29 ($72k) Expenses 57 ($197k) Net assets 70 ($664k)2022 Revenue 29 ($71k) Expenses 45 ($155k) Net assets 0 ($0)
201720182019202020212022
Revenue (29)Expenses (45)Net assets (0)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 16% · 2020 12% · 2021 30% · 2022 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

−$98k
’17
−$66k
’18
−$63k
’19
−$71k
’20
−$124k
’21
−$84k
’22
1.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'17
total
Sabine Oaks Homeunclassified
$10k
funders
1

From the IRS filings of TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS's grant income comes from Texas funders.

TX

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Fort Worth Garden Club Inc79%Texas Botanical Gardens and Na American Interpretive Center78%El Paso Childrens Garden Inc78%Texas Garden Clubs Inc77%Fort Worth Botanical Society Inc77%River Oaks Garden Club77%South Texas Botanical Gardens76%Texas Governors Mansion Greenhouse Project76%

Nationally

Fort Worth Garden Club Inc79%Texas Botanical Gardens and Na American Interpretive Center78%El Paso Childrens Garden Inc78%Texas Garden Clubs Inc77%Shreveport Garden Study Club77%Three Village Garden Club77%Fort Worth Botanical Society Inc77%River Oaks Garden Club77%
04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS?
TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS (Texas) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $10,000 to it, the largest being Sabine Oaks Home ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $10,000 in grants to TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS.
Who is the largest funder of TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS?
Sabine Oaks Home is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like TEXAS GARDEN CLUBS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing