Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

S Weldon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Human Services$309kHousing & Shelter$24kYouth Development$13kHealth$9kAnimals$5kEducation$3kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,080
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 99% of reported assets are held in Sei Investments.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE HOUSE$60,000
ALPHA RESOURCE CENTER$5,166
TAYLOR HOUSE$5,000
GRAMAS HOUSE OF HOPE$3,000
HEARTS THERAPEUTIC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
COLLETTES CHILDREN HOMES$2,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$1,500
THE CHANGE REACTION$1,180
STUDENT LUNCH BOX$1,090
Individual grant recipient$1,080
PROJECT HOPE ALLIANCE$1,080
LITTLE HANDS$1,040
GIVING CHILDREN HOPE$1,033
Individual grant recipient$1,033
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TAYLOR HOUSE: $5k → 6%LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 11%TAYLOR HOUSE: $4k → 6%TAYLOR HOUSE: $2k → 6%THE CHANGE REACTION: $1k → 14%CORNERSTONE HOUSE SANTA BARBARA: $40k → 14%THE ELI HOME: $4k → 10%THE ELI HOME: $1k → 10%THE ELI HOME: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$310k · 11 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$310k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+39%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +22%
  • ST
    SUPPORTING THE TAYLOR HOUSE INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • TE
    THE ELI HOME INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6k · revenue +484%

Funded once

  • CH
    CORNERSTONE HOUSE OF SANTA BARBARA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +39%
  • LA
    LITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -11%
  • LC
    LIBERTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laurel House Inc dba Hope Harbor

The mission of Laurel House (dba Hope Harbor) is providing a home for teens in crisis, transforming lives, and strengthening families. Laurel House has the only long-term youth shelters in Orange County, CA for runaway, homeless and…

2
Milestone House

Milestone House assists disadvantaged children and young adults, primarily those who come from the foster care system, by creating and implementing innovative programs that provide a variety of need services, including treatment services,…

Unclassified
3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

4
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
5
Loving Hands Childrens Home

Provide loving home environment, continuity of care, and empowerment of displaced and fragile children.

Housing & Shelter
6
Eagle Rock Boys Home

Residential care for children

Housing & Shelter
7
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
8
Human Services Network Dba Youth Services Network Inc

Our missions is to restore youth to lives of purpose, meaning and opportunity. human services network, dba youth services network (ysn), was founded in 1985. ysn operates three (3) community-based homes that serve boys from throughout los…

Health
9
Inland Temporary Homes

Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…

10
Los Angeles Youth Network

Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…

Human Services
11
Temporary Shelter Inc

The mission of Temporary Shelter, Inc. is to operate an emergency homeless shelter within the City of Tustin, California.

Housing & Shelter
12
House of Hope Green Bay Inc

House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Youth Shelter and the most unlike its peers is The Change Reaction. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORNERSTONE HOUSE — $245,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE HOUSEALPHA RESOURCE CENTER — $10,166 · Other+11 more — $25,857 · Other+11 moreCORNERSTONE HOUSE OF SANTA BARBARA INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE HOUSE …SUPPORTING THE TAYLOR HOUSE INC — $10,152 · Human ServicesSUPPORTING THE TAY…THE ELI HOME INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE ELI HOME INCLITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS — $5,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE ANGELS SERV…+1 more — $1,180 · Human ServicesGRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE — $11,976 · Housing & ShelterOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $6,150 · Housing & ShelterCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $4,000 · Housing & ShelterCASA YOUTH SHELTER — $1,010 · Housing & ShelterLIBERTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $2,000 · EducationProject Hope Alliance — $1,080 · EducationPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $1,500 · HealthCONNORS HEROES FOUNDATION — $1,236 · HealthGIVING CHILDREN HOPE — $1,033 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,000 · InternationalROBYNES NEST — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley — $500 · Youth Development
Other$281,023Human Services$62,332Housing & Shelter$23,136Education$3,080Health$2,736International$2,033Youth Development$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORNERSTONE HOUSE OF SANTA BARBARA INC — $40,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetGRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE — $11,976 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUPPORTING THE TAYLOR HOUSE INC — $10,152 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $6,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELI HOME INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE ANGELS SERVICE DOGS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNORS HEROES FOUNDATION — $1,236 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHANGE REACTION — $1,180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT LUNCHBOX INC — $1,090 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetProject Hope Alliance — $1,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING CHILDREN HOPE — $1,033 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA YOUTH SHELTER — $1,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBYNES NEST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Deacon Charitable Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Glen and Dorothy Stillwell Charitable Trust · Angels Baseball Foundation Inc · O L Halsell Foundation · Orange County's United Way · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · California Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization S Weldon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph