· Private foundation
S Robert and Joy W Cohen Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAKON-JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES | $25,000 |
| GDP AYURVEDIC UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| CHABAD OF SOUTH AUSTIN | $10,800 |
| SHALOM AUSTIN | $5,000 |
| ADVOCATES HOUSE OF PRAYER | $4,000 |
| CHOSEN PEOPLE MINISTRIES | $3,000 |
| MESSIANIC JEWISH ALLIANCE OF AMERICA | $2,000 |
| CHABAD OF AUSTIN | $1,000 |
| REVIVAL FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| JLF TEXAS | $1,000 |
| CEDAR PARK FRIENDS ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| CONGREGATION AGUDAS ACHIM SYNAGOGUE | $500 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS AUSTIN | $500 |
| CITIZENS UNITED FOUNDATION | $124 |
| CONVENTION OF AMERICAN STATES | $100 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization S Robert and Joy W Cohen Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S Robert and Joy W Cohen Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on S Robert and Joy W Cohen’s filings →