Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

S Livingston Mather Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$359k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$897kArts & Culture$599kHealth$340kEnvironment$272kFood & Nutrition$116kHuman Services$79kPublic Safety & Disaster$67kEmployment$44kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $178k
$6,650
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS$73,400
UC MERCED FINANCIAL AID$55,000
CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$34,000
HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL$16,400
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$12,300
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL$10,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$10,000
HOLDEN FORESTS AND GARDENS$10,000
IDEASTREAM$10,000
CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$9,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$7,000
VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES$6,650
FRIENDS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA AVALANCHE CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FIRST GENRATION INVESTORS INC: $5k → 10%FIRST GENRATION INVESTORS INC: $5k → 10%FIRST GENERATION INVESTORS INC: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MT
NY
MA
NV
OH
NJ
CA
VA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of S Livingston Mather Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 62% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 53% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

S Livingston Mather Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 45 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
7

Total granted

$2.4M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+170%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $533k · revenue +17%
  • CM
    CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $402k · revenue +76%
  • I
    IDEASTREAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $23k
  • EH
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCHgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +170%
  • TU
    THE UNIONVILLE TAVERN PRESERVATION SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Creek Conservancy

Our mission is to enrich the lives of all people in northeast ohio by conserving natural habitats, restoring the ecological value of our region's lands and waters, and expanding opportunities to connect people from all cultures to…

Environment
2
The Ohio Environmental Council

To protect the environment and health of all ohio communities through legal and policy advocacy, decision-maker accountability, and civic engagement.

Environment
3
Chagrin River Watershed Partners Inc

Preserving and enhancing the scenic and environmental quality of the ecosystem of the chagrin river, lake erie and other ohio watersheds in a manner which assures a sustainable future for people, plants and animals.

Human Services
4
Western Reserve Historical Society

Western reserve historical society preserves and uses its collections, historic sites, and museums to inspire people to discover the american experience by exploring the tangible history of northeast ohio.

Arts & Culture
5
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
6
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
7
Lake Erie Nature and Science Center

Lake erie nature & science center educates and inspires each of us to understand, appreciate, and take responsibility for our natural world. serving more than 100,000 people each year with animal exhibits and programs, planetarium shows,…

Arts & Culture
8
Dunham Tavern Museum & Gardens

To preserve, develop, and share historic dunham tavern and its campus as an educational and cultural resource. we aspire for dunham tavern as an institution to provide an urban green space in midtown cleveland, and to return the tavern to…

Arts & Culture
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Cleveland Arts Prize

The cleveland arts prize identifies, rewards, publicly honors and promotes those creative artists whose original work and accomplishments have set a standard of excellence to which other artists can aspire. additionally, the cleveland arts…

Arts & Culture
11
America's River Roots Experience

America's river roots' mission is a quest to forge deeper connections to america's inland river waterways, aiming to highlight the pivotal role the ohio river played in shaping our nation. sparked by america's 250th anniversary, this…

Arts & Culture
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservancy for Cuyahoga Valley National Park and the most unlike its peers is Singers Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesDevelopmental Disabilities …Community College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%3%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr16%23%35–55yr20%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr21%2%10–20yr14%12%20–35yr16%10%35–55yr20%76%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,274

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $203,250 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUC MERCED FINANCIAL AID — $134,000 · OtherUC MERCED FINANCIAL AIDHOLDEN FORESTS AND GARDENS — $82,000 · OtherHOLDEN FORESTS AND GARDENSUNIVERSITY HOSPITAL — $71,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALSTONEBROOK MONTESSORI SCHOOL — $64,500 · OtherSTONEBROOK MONTESSORI SCHOOLWOMENSAFE INC — $40,000 · OtherCircle Health Services — $37,500 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $37,000 · Other+23 more — $239,200 · Other+23 moreCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $533,400 · EducationCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTSLAKE ERIE COLLEGE — $88,000 · EducationLAKE ERIE COLLEGEHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $34,150 · EducationBLOOMINGDALEFAMILYPROGRAMINC — $26,500 · Education+2 more — $30,000 · EducationCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $401,750 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NA…CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $47,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF AR…Ohio To Erie Trail Fund — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $11,500 · Arts & CultureYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $70,500 · EnvironmentWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $36,300 · EnvironmentCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK — $25,000 · EnvironmentDOAN BROOK WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP — $12,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH — $10,000 · EnvironmentCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP — $6,000 · EnvironmentIDEASTREAM — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $46,500 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $30,750 · Food & NutritionVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES — $44,150 · Employment
Other$908,750Education$712,050Arts & Culture$480,250Environment$159,800Youth Development$90,000Food & Nutrition$77,250Employment$44,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS — $533,400 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $401,750 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetIDEASTREAM — $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE ERIE COLLEGE — $88,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $70,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART — $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $46,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES — $44,150 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCircle Health Services — $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $37,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY — $36,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $34,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $30,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOMINGDALEFAMILYPROGRAMINC — $26,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA AVALANCHE CENTER — $23,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOhio To Erie Trail Fund — $20,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED — $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOAN BROOK WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP — $12,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFIRST GENERATION INVESTORS — $12,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetLAKE COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LAKELAND FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO END OF LIFE OPTIONS — $8,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTHE UNIONVILLE TAVERN PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $7,500 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCITIZENS CLIMATE EDUCATION CORP — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLEGE OF THE ARTS
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
  • Who funds IDEASTREAM
  • Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES
  • Who funds WOMENSAFE INC
  • Who funds Circle Health Services
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY
  • Who funds BLOOMINGDALEFAMILYPROGRAMINC
  • Who funds CONSERVANCY FOR CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA AVALANCHE CENTER
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Ohio To Erie Trail Fund
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CIRCLE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds DOAN BROOK WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds FIRST GENERATION INVESTORS
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH WATCH
  • Who funds THE LAKELAND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EDITH WHARTON RESTORATION INC
  • Who funds OHIO END OF LIFE OPTIONS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · The George Gund Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Emma R Fox Char Trust Mut Fds · The Swagelok Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization S Livingston Mather Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Edith Wharton Restoration Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph