Skip to content

California · Private foundation

S Ku Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2025
11
Organizations funded FY2024
45%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$71,758
Organizations funded a year
1 to 16
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$975k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 45% of the organizations S Ku Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 25% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesReligionInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$136k30%
FY202411$146k45%
FY202316$153k94%
FY20221$5k100%
FY20211$30k100%
FY20201$150100%
FY20192$53k0%
FY20182$303kn/a
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$405kReligion$195kHealth$115kEducation$50kArts & Culture$26kInternational$14kPublic Benefit$150Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($234k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

S Ku Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSaratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council: $350,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetNational Taiwan University Academic Development Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCityteam Ministries: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Asian Americans for Community Involvement of Santa Clara County Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hope Chinese Cancer Care Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBliss & Wisdom Charitable Organization: $14,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetChinese American Coalition for Compassionate Care: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAmerican Lung Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Children with Special Needs: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLupus Foundation of America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDong Fang Chinese Performing Arts Association: $6,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetGirls Who Code Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaratoga Theatre Arts: $4,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetHakone Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWomensv: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWreaths Across America: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sutter Bay Medical FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sutter Bay Medical Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare S Ku Foundation with peer funders

About S Ku Foundation

How much does S Ku Foundation give?
S Ku Foundation reported 10 grants totaling $135,708 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does S Ku Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (49%), Religion (24%), Health (14%).
Who are S Ku Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Saratoga Area Senior Coordinating Council ($350k), Heart of Hope ($40k), National Taiwan University Academic Development Foundation ($30k).
Does S Ku Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 45% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does S Ku Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as S Ku Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sutter Bay Medical Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.
Where is S Ku Foundation based?
S Ku Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on S Ku’s filings →

More from the funding graph