· Private foundation
Ruth Mott Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $591k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $400,000 |
| GENESEE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION | $390,000 |
| URBAN RENAISSANCE CENTER | $315,000 |
| GENESEE COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITY | $300,000 |
| EVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE | $150,000 |
| SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE | $150,000 |
| METRO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC | $150,000 |
| SIPI INC | $141,230 |
| HISPANIC TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY CENTER DBA LATINX TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNIT | $125,000 |
| ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $112,500 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT HUB | $105,000 |
| YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FLINT | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITIES FIRST INC | $95,000 |
| MADE INSTITUTE | $92,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Ruth Mott Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
93 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SBSYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +262% · 32% of their budget
- MCMetro Community DevelopmentInc6× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +66%
- ACASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP8× · 2017–2024 · $902k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- FSFRESH START COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCone grant, 2018 · $250k
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2023 · $160k
- ECEVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITITATIVEone grant, 2017 · $150k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the common economic interests of all the commercial enterprises in the Genesee County, Michigan community. The Organization strives to enhance the business climate in the area and advocates for public policy that supports…
The flint center for educational excellence is building an educational ecosystem that works for all flint kids by providing programs. research, and advocacy that ensure flint kids, their families, schools, and communities thrive.
Improve the health of genesee county residents. improve the quality and cost effectiveness of the health care system in our community.
Housed in flint, michigan, we are a non-profit with a mission to relieve the innovator of the entrepreneurial burden. we know entrepreneurship can be difficult, and that's why we're here to help. as a community of student professionals,…
Flint Social Club is to lower access barriers for the Flint food community by mentoring chefs and creating equitable opportunities for growth.
The Genesee Area Focus Fund's purpose is to receive and administer funds dedicated to improving the economy and quality of life of the people of Genesee County, Michigan. The Focus Fund provides support to publicly supported organizations…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.
To be a source of new ideas on how michigan's people, enterprises, and communities can succeed in the information age.
Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Flint and the most unlike its peers is Specialized Employment Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds URBAN RENAISSANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FLINT POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT IN ↗
- Who funds Metro Community DevelopmentInc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT HUB ↗
- Who funds St Luke N E W Life Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Genesee County Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds Flint and Genesee Group Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT ↗
- Who funds Flint Institute of Music ↗
- Who funds THE MADE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT ↗
- Who funds InvolvedDad ↗
- Who funds CRIME STOPPERS OF FLINT & GENESEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLINT AND GENESEE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TAPOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds Child Care Network ↗
- Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Services of Eastern Michigan ↗
- Who funds SPECIALIZED EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CPSA COURIER ↗
- Who funds MOTHERLY INTERCESSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Flint · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Foundation for Flint · Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable Trust · The Hagerman Foundation · Anna Paulina Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Nartel Family Foundation · The Serra Foundation · United Way of Genesee County · Merkley Charitable Trust · The Whiting Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ruth Mott Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ruth Mott Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ruth Mott Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.