Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth Mott Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$9.5MCommunity Improvement$9.3MRecreation & Sports$3.5MYouth Development$3.4MEmployment$3.1MArts & Culture$3.0MHuman Services$2.9MEducation$2.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $591k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$272M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$400,000
GENESEE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION$390,000
URBAN RENAISSANCE CENTER$315,000
GENESEE COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITY$300,000
EVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE$150,000
METRO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC$150,000
SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE$150,000
SIPI INC$141,230
HISPANIC TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY CENTER DBA LATINX TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNIT$125,000
ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$112,500
NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT HUB$105,000
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FLINT$100,000
UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY$100,000
COMMUNITIES FIRST INC$95,000
MADE INSTITUTE$92,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $4k → 14%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $40k → 9%GIRLS ON THE RUN MID MICHIGAN INC: $10k → 12%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $75k → 14%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $40k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $40k → 9%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $60k → 14%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $40k → 9%ARAB COMMUNITY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL SERVICES ACCESS: $10k → 21%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $40k → 9%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $60k → 14%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $35k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $35k → 9%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $60k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $50k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $50k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $50k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK WASHTENAW REGIONAL 4C: $50k → 14%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%HAND OF HOPE-FLM: $5k → 16%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION INC: $250k → 16%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION INC: $230k → 16%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION INC: $150k → 16%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION INC: $100k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $75k → 16%INVOLVEDDAD: $60k → 16%YWCA GREATER FLINT: $15k → 16%FRIENDS OF BERSTON: $5k → 16%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION INC: $5k → 16%FRIENDS OF BERSTON: $5k → 16%CROSSOVER OUTREACH: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
DE
NM
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Ruth Mott Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ruth Mott Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 93 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

93 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

93
63

Total granted

$39M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+43%

Still filing today

63%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +262% · 32% of their budget
  • MC
    Metro Community DevelopmentInc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +66%
  • AC
    ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $902k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • FS
    FRESH START COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $250k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $160k
  • EC
    EVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITITATIVE
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Flint & Genesee Group

To promote the common economic interests of all the commercial enterprises in the Genesee County, Michigan community. The Organization strives to enhance the business climate in the area and advocates for public policy that supports…

Community Improvement
2
Flint Center for Educational Excellence

The flint center for educational excellence is building an educational ecosystem that works for all flint kids by providing programs. research, and advocacy that ensure flint kids, their families, schools, and communities thrive.

Education
3
Greater Flint Health Coalition Inc

Improve the health of genesee county residents. improve the quality and cost effectiveness of the health care system in our community.

Health
4
Ferris Wheel Innovation Center

Housed in flint, michigan, we are a non-profit with a mission to relieve the innovator of the entrepreneurial burden. we know entrepreneurship can be difficult, and that's why we're here to help. as a community of student professionals,…

Education
5
Flint Social Club

Flint Social Club is to lower access barriers for the Flint food community by mentoring chefs and creating equitable opportunities for growth.

Employment
6
Genesee Area Focus Fund

The Genesee Area Focus Fund's purpose is to receive and administer funds dedicated to improving the economy and quality of life of the people of Genesee County, Michigan. The Focus Fund provides support to publicly supported organizations…

—
7
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
8
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
9
Michigan Future Inc

To be a source of new ideas on how michigan's people, enterprises, and communities can succeed in the information age.

Unclassified
10
Family Outreach Center

Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.

—
11
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
12
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Flint; the most unlike its peers is Specialized Employment Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/95
Grantees still filing
65/95
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENESEE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION: $3,129,617 · OtherGENESEE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIONGENESEE COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITY: $2,171,800 · OtherGENESEE COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITYSIPI INC: $1,196,875 · OtherCITY OF FLINT: $1,135,854 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FLINT: $941,930 · OtherSt Luke N E W Life Center Inc: $828,000 · OtherGenesee County Habitat for Humanity: $814,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $800,000 · OtherFLINT DISTRICT LIBRARY DBA FLINT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $775,000 · OtherFLINT POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,179,723 · OtherEVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT IN: $1,060,000 · Other+101 more: $9,168,664 · Other+101 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $5,063,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION O…UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY: $2,110,460 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GENESEE …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION F…MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $990,000 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDA…+8 more: $355,222 · PhilanthropySYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE: $1,599,350 · Community ImprovementSYLVESTER BROOME…URBAN RENAISSANCE CENTER: $1,340,702 · Community ImprovementURBAN RENAISSANC…Metro Community DevelopmentInc: $1,059,459 · Community ImprovementMetro Community …ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $902,215 · Community ImprovementASBURY COMMUNITY…NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT HUB: $898,425 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD ENG…THE MADE INSTITUTE: $650,500 · Community ImprovementTHE MADE INSTITU…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $525,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVE…Flint Institute of Music: $683,416 · Arts & CultureTAPOLOGY INC: $480,000 · Arts & CultureSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC: $441,000 · Arts & CultureFlint Cultural Center Corporation: $261,248 · Arts & CultureAFRICAN DRUM & DANCE PARENTS ASSOCIATION: $188,000 · Arts & CultureBANGTOWN STUDIO ON THE GO: $173,200 · Arts & CultureEl Ballet Folklorico Estudiantil: $129,980 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $122,953 · Arts & CultureNORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT: $735,000 · Human ServicesInvolvedDad: $585,000 · Human ServicesChild Care Network: $455,000 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $270,000 · Human Services+7 more: $58,500 · Human ServicesCRIME STOPPERS OF FLINT & GENESEE COUNTY: $563,700 · Crime & LegalLegal Services of Eastern Michigan: $415,464 · Crime & LegalMOTHERLY INTERCESSION: $298,800 · Crime & LegalRe-Connections Inc: $175,000 · Crime & LegalMICHIGAN CENTER FOR YOUTH JUSTICE: $68,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more: $98,500 · Crime & LegalBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT: $585,465 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLINT AND GENESEE COUNTY: $562,000 · Youth DevelopmentACTIVE BOYS IN CHRIST: $224,875 · Youth DevelopmentCLINGMAN FOUNDATION: $190,400 · Youth Development
Other$23,201,463Philanthropy$9,518,682Community Improvement$6,975,651Arts & Culture$2,479,797Human Services$2,103,500Crime & Legal$1,619,464Youth Development$1,562,740

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $5,063,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY: $2,110,460 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetSYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE: $1,599,350 over 7y, 32% of budgetURBAN RENAISSANCE CENTER: $1,340,702 over 6y, 89% of budgetFLINT POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,179,723 over 4y, 91% of budgetEVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT IN: $1,060,000 over 7y, 49% of budgetMetro Community DevelopmentInc: $1,059,459 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $990,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $902,215 over 8y, 24% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT HUB: $898,425 over 6y, 53% of budgetSt Luke N E W Life Center Inc: $828,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetGenesee County Habitat for Humanity: $814,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetFlint and Genesee Group Foundation: $763,680 over 7y, 20% of budgetNORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT: $735,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetFlint Institute of Music: $683,416 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetTHE MADE INSTITUTE: $650,500 over 8y, 70% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT: $585,465 over 6y, 11% of budgetInvolvedDad: $585,000 over 8y, 70% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS OF FLINT & GENESEE COUNTY: $563,700 over 8y, 50% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLINT AND GENESEE COUNTY: $562,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $525,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTAPOLOGY INC: $480,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetChild Care Network: $455,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC: $441,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC: $430,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetLegal Services of Eastern Michigan: $415,464 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetCPSA COURIER: $356,210 over 7y, 46% of budgetMOTHERLY INTERCESSION: $298,800 over 7y, 12% of budgetFaith Foundation Resources: $284,048 over 5y, 35% of budgetPROJECT SYNCERE: $278,800 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SHIAWASSEE AND GENESEE COUNTIES: $276,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $270,000 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetFlint Cultural Center Corporation: $261,248 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT: $244,770 over 6y, 24% of budgetACTIVE BOYS IN CHRIST: $224,875 over 7y, 23% of budgetCommunities First Inc: $210,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCLINGMAN FOUNDATION: $190,400 over 6y, 55% of budgetAFRICAN DRUM & DANCE PARENTS ASSOCIATION: $188,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetTHE CRIM FITNESS FOUNDATION INC: $186,240 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFlint Institute of Science & History: $179,600 over 2y, 67% of budgetRe-Connections Inc: $175,000 over 7y, 45% of budgetBANGTOWN STUDIO ON THE GO: $173,200 over 5y, 43% of budgetGREATER FLINT ARTS COUNCIL: $151,380 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSAFE & JUST MICHIGAN: $135,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetEl Ballet Folklorico Estudiantil: $129,980 over 8y, 17% of budgetFLOYD J MCREE THEATRE: $123,750 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS: $113,300 over 7y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SYLVESTER BROOME EMPOWERMENT VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds URBAN RENAISSANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FLINT POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT IN ↗
  • Who funds Metro Community DevelopmentInc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ENGAGEMENT HUB ↗
  • Who funds St Luke N E W Life Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Genesee County Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Flint and Genesee Group Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT ↗
  • Who funds Flint Institute of Music ↗
  • Who funds THE MADE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER FLINT ↗
  • Who funds InvolvedDad ↗
  • Who funds CRIME STOPPERS OF FLINT & GENESEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FLINT AND GENESEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TAPOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Care Network ↗
  • Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIR FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Legal Services of Eastern Michigan ↗
  • Who funds SPECIALIZED EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CPSA COURIER ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERLY INTERCESSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater FlintMI114.3× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Flint · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Foundation for Flint · Stella & Frederick Loeb Charitable Trust · The Hagerman Foundation · Anna Paulina Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Nartel Family Foundation · The Serra Foundation · United Way of Genesee County · Merkley Charitable Trust · The Whiting Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth Mott Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth Mott Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ruth Mott Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ruth Mott Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth Mott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph