Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth & William Merkey Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$189k
Granted FY2026still arriving
30
Grants FY2026still arriving
14
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$640kHuman Services$240kFood & Nutrition$215kHealth$184kInternational$133kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kPhilanthropy$43kEnvironment$36kOther$0
02FY2026 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k24 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $82k
$5,700
Median grant
14
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF THE HOLY CROSS$28,349
Individual grant recipient$10,800
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$10,800
FRIENDS OF KOWAK$10,800
PAULS PANTRY$10,800
NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,800
SALVATORIAN MISSION WAREHOUSE$7,400
SALVATION ARMY OF BROWN COUNTY$7,400
CROSIER BROTHERS AND FATHERS$5,900
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,900
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$5,900
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,900
PROJECT HOPE$5,700
ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER$5,700
XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND$5,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $6k → 5%FRIENDS OF KOWAK: $11k → 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%FRIENDS OF KOWAK: $11k → 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%FRIENDS OF KOWAK: $11k → 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%FRIENDS OF KOWAK: $10k → 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%FRIENDS OF KOWAK: $10k → 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%FRIENDS OF KOWAK: $9k → 9%UNBOUND: $650 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $5k → 5%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $4k → 5%UNBOUND: $600 → 16%ADOPT-A-NATIVE-ELDER: $4k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
MS
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 34 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against -53% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
1

Total granted

$1.8M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-53%

Still filing today

44%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
    10× · 2017–2026 · $135k · revenue +96%
  • PP
    PAUL'S PANTRY INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $102k · revenue +50%
  • NC
    NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD
    10× · 2017–2026 · $100k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • TN
    Thrive Networks Global
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
2
ServeNow

Sharing Christ's passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
5
Medical Missions Outreach Inc

In 2005, medical missions outreach began pointing others to the great physician through an annual medical missions trip to the developing world by partnering with local churches to reach their communities with the gospel. now more than 20…

International
6
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
7
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
8
Connectree

Connectree's vision is to help missionaries have the care and support they need, financially, physically, emotionally and spiritually, to carry out the ministry that god has called them to do. our 5 distinctives are: missionary care,…

Community Improvement
9
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
10
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
11
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
12
The Orphanetwork

The mission of ORPHANetwork is to partner with the the local church to break cycles of poverty amongst highly vulnerable children.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Kowak. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $267,345 · OtherSISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF THE HOLY CROSSIndividual grant recipient: $107,759 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD: $99,716 · OtherNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTDSALVATION ARMY OF BROWN COUNTY: $69,288 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF BROWN COUNTYMARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERS: $68,984 · OtherMARYKNOLL FATHERS AND BROTHERSCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $60,800 · OtherBENEDICTINE MISSION HOUSE: $56,000 · OtherCROSIER BROTHERS AND FATHERS: $55,825 · OtherXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $55,600 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $48,200 · OtherHSHS ST VINCENTST MARY'S HOSPITAL: $47,800 · OtherCATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $45,400 · Other+10 more: $257,445 · Other+10 moreSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $134,747 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST…PAUL'S PANTRY INC: $102,264 · Food & NutritionPAUL'S PANTRY …SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $47,850 · ReligionCommunity Bible Study: $35,050 · ReligionLIVING FAITH FOUNDATION: $28,100 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $23,500 · ReligionMobile Hope: $5,100 · ReligionFriends of Kowak: $62,340 · Human ServicesAdopt-A-Native Elder: $48,700 · Human ServicesUnbound: $6,350 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $53,450 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $41,300 · International+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalAmerican Bird Conservancy: $17,300 · Animals
Other$1,240,162Food & Nutrition$237,011Religion$139,600Human Services$117,390International$97,250Animals$17,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $134,747 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $102,264 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD: $99,716 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of Kowak: $62,340 over 6y, 16% of budgetXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $55,600 over 10y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $53,450 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetAdopt-A-Native Elder: $48,700 over 10y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $47,850 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $41,300 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Bible Study: $35,050 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING FAITH FOUNDATION: $28,100 over 10y, 3.2% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $23,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $17,300 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $6,350 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Kowak ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Adopt-A-Native Elder ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Bible Study ↗
  • Who funds LIVING FAITH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Hope ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Thrive Networks Global ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth & William Merkey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth & William Merkey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ruth & William Merkey Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ruth & William Merkey Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth & William Merkey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph