Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth and Robert St John Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$184k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$346kHealth$293kArts & Culture$232kYouth Development$176kEnvironment$64kHousing & Shelter$60kPhilanthropy$54kEducation$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $122k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY$15,000
FOR ALL SEASONS$15,000
CRITCHLOW ADKINS CHILDRENS CENTER$12,500
EES CARE PACKS PROGRAM$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHANNEL MARKER$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
TALBOT COUNTY FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$7,000
PICKERING CREEK AUDUBON FOUNDATION$6,000
POSITIVE STRIDES$6,000
PARTNERS IN CARE$5,500
MID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
DIXON HOUSE$5,000
ST MICHAELS COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TALBOT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: $20k → 10%MID SHORE PRO BONO: $5k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $3k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $3k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $3k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $3k → 10%TALBOT HOSPICE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 51 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
22

Total granted

$1.4M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+44%

Still filing today

31%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FOR ALL SEASONS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +279%
  • CA
    CHESAPEAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +33%
  • CM
    CHANNEL MARKER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TT
    TEAM TRACE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $28k · revenue -6%
  • TC
    TALBOT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +74% · 70% of their budget
  • TC
    TALBOT COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Talbot County Inc

Casa of the mid-shore advocates for the best interest of children who are under the protection of the circuit courts of talbot, dorchester, queen annes and kent counties due to abuse, neglect or abandonment.

Civil Rights
2
Talisman Therapeutic Riding Inc

At talisman, we believe in the transformative, healing power of horses and our natural environment. we serve, empower all, and lead by example with compassion, dignity, and inclusivity.

Health
3
Talbot Interfaith Shelter Inc

Talbot interfaith shelter is dedicated to ending homelessness on maryland's mid-shore by providing shelter, stability, support and a path to success for families and individuals in need.

Housing & Shelter
4
The Arc of Southern Maryland Inc

Create opportunities for independence and personal success for people with different abilities in inclusive communities.

—
5
Charles County Harc Inc

Provide residential and human services to individuals with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
6
Historical Society Harford Cou

Preserve the history of Harford County, Maryland

—
7
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science
8
First Maryland Disability Trust Inc

To enhance the quality of life, autonomy and dignity of marylanders with disabilities by offering cost effective trust services to protect, manage and use trust assets for beneficiaries while preserving eligibility for public and private…

Human Services
9
Chesapeake Group Homes Inc

The center provides independent living arrangements and recreational activities for handicapped individuals

Human Services
10
The Maryland Association of Community Services for Persons With Developmental

Dedicated to strengthening agencies to better support people with developmental disabilities and their families in their own communities through advocacy that promotes the highest standards of program excellence, fostering a climate that…

—
11
Potomac Case Management Services Inc

Potomac case management services, inc. enhances the quality of life and maintains independence for individuals of the tri-state community through the use of advocacy and partnerships.

Health
12
Chesapeake Care Resources Inc

To provide quality services that enhance and improve life for individuals who have a developmental disability

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dixon House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRITCHLOW ADKINS CHILDRENS CENTER: $90,000 · OtherCRITCHLOW ADKINS CHILDRENS CENTERFOR ALL SEASONS INC: $80,000 · OtherFOR ALL SEASONS INCEES CARE PACKS PROGRAM: $80,000 · OtherEES CARE PACKS PROGRAMCASA OF MID-SHORE: $70,000 · OtherCASA OF MID-SHOREST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY: $60,500 · OtherTALBOT COUNTY FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $56,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,100 · OtherPOSITIVE STRIDES INC: $48,000 · OtherTHE DIXON HOUSE INC: $42,500 · Other+58 more: $649,000 · Other+58 moreAVALON FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTALBOT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $29,000 · Arts & CultureTRED AVON PLAYERS INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureOXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCHANNEL MARKER INC: $58,500 · HealthTEAM TRACE INC: $27,500 · HealthCHESAPEAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY: $63,500 · EnvironmentPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC: $43,500 · PhilanthropyMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyST MICHAELS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsFREEDOM ROWERS INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsTALBOT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSHORE LEGAL ACCESS INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,226,100Arts & Culture$94,500Health$86,000Environment$63,500Philanthropy$53,500Recreation & Sports$42,000Human Services$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOR ALL SEASONS INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY: $63,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetCHANNEL MARKER INC: $58,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPOSITIVE STRIDES INC: $48,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC: $43,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DIXON HOUSE INC: $42,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetST MICHAELS COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $40,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetAVALON FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTALBOT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $29,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTRED AVON PLAYERS INC: $28,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetTEAM TRACE INC: $27,500 over 1y, 23% of budgetTALBOT MENTORSINC: $23,500 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetTALBOT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetTALBOT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMID SHORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTON ROTARY CLUB YOUTH AND COMMUNITY FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetOXFORD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSHORE LEGAL ACCESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEMORY & HENRY UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorwich University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF HOPE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFREEDOM ROWERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOR ALL SEASONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHANNEL MARKER INC ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE STRIDES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DIXON HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MICHAELS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AVALON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds TRED AVON PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM TRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT MENTORSINC ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TALBOT HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CHOPTANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid Shore Community Foundation IncMD46.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · The Llandaff Family Trust · Dock Street Foundation · Grayce B Kerr Fund Inc · The Seip Family Foundation Limited Eevercore Trust CO C/O Ashley Ferriello · Watson Stone Family Foundation Inc · Richard J and Ellen G Bodorff Charitable Foundation Inc · The Michael and Nancy Klein Foundation Inc · T & M Mitchell Fdn Dima-Blrk · The Rosenfeld Rumford Steckler Family Foundation Inc · Qlarant Foundation Inc · Van Strum Foundation 8833023

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth and Robert St John Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth and Robert St John Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Talbot County Arts Council Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Partners in Care Maryland Inc: 40% of income from government
  • For All Seasons Inc: 22% of income from government
  • St Michaels Community Center Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Habitat for Humanity Choptank Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Shore Legal Access Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Avalon Foundation Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Norwich University: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruth and Robert St John’s filings →

More from the funding graph