Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ruth & Jacques Sartisky Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$71kEducation$27kEnvironment$22kScience & Tech$9kHousing & Shelter$5kCivil Rights$1kHuman Services$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
6
States reached
$326k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLUE RIDGE PUBLIC RADIO$3,000
ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION$2,000
MOUNTAIN TRUE$2,000
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION$2,000
BRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION$1,500
THE GUARDIAN FOUNDATION$750
MANNA FOODBANK$600
WILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY$500
YMCA OF WNC$250
PBS NORTH CAROLINA$250
WIKI FOUNDATION$250
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$250
ASHEVILLE ART MUSEUM$250
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%BRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $2k → 28%ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG: $3k → 12%CAROLINA FORWARD: $1k → 13%BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $4k → 15%TENNESSEE WILLIAMS LITERARY FEST: $1k → 23%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%BRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $2k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVI: $2k → 12%BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%BRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $2k → 28%ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG: $2k → 12%BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%BRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $2k → 28%ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%ALUMNI ASSOC BRONX HS OF SCIENCE: $1k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%ALUMNI ASSOC BRONX HS OF SCIENCE: $1k → 28%ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG: $1k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%BRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $1k → 28%FAIRVIEW FOREST HOMEOWNERS' ASSOC: $5k → 12%WILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY: $1k → 12%WILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY: $1k → 12%MOUNTAIN TRUE: $4k → 12%ASHEVILLE ART MUSEUM: $3k → 12%BLUE RIDGE PUBLIC RADIO: $3k → 12%BLUE RIDGE PUBLIC RADIO: $3k → 12%THOMAS WOLFE MEMORIAL ADVISORY: $3k → 12%MOUNTAIN TRUE: $3k → 12%THOMAS WOLFE MEMORIAL ADVISORY: $2k → 12%MOUNTAIN TRUE: $2k → 12%THOMAS WOLFE MEMORIAL ADVISORY: $2k → 12%THOMAS WOLFE MEMORIAL ADVISORY: $2k → 12%BLUE RIDGE PUBLIC RADIO: $1k → 12%BLUE RIDGE PUBLIC RADIO: $1k → 12%MOUNTAIN TRUE: $1k → 12%ASHEVILLE ART MUSEUM: $1k → 12%MOUNTAIN TRUE: $1k → 12%DIANA WORTHAM THEATRE: $1k → 12%WESTERN NC HISTORICAL ASSOC: $4k → 12%WESTERN NC HISTORICAL ASSOC: $2k → 12%WESTERN NC HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%WESTERN NC HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 12%WARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NH
IL
NY
IA
CA
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$134k · 46 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
19

Total granted

$134k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+80%

Still filing today

54%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +246%
  • UA
    University at Buffalo Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +27%
  • M
    MountainTrue
    7× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +258%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVI
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • TW
    TENNESSEE WILLIAMS LITERARY FEST
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

2
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
7
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

9
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
10
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
11
North Carolina Bar Association

The north carolina bar association is organized for the purposes of promoting and improving the administration of justice in north carolina; fostering and encouraging law reform when in the public interest; advancing the science of…

12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Government Accountability R…Public University Foundatio…Elementary Literacy TutoringFood Pantries & AssistanceDevelopmental Disabilities …Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Animal Rescue and AdoptionFallen First Responder Supp…Classical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr12%32%35–55yr12%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%8%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr14%11%20–35yr12%37%35–55yr12%19%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
27/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THOMAS WOLFE MEMORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE INC — $8,625 · OtherTHOMAS WOLFE MEMORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE …WESTERN NC HISTORICAL ASSOC — $8,250 · OtherWESTERN NC HISTORICAL ASSOCBRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATION — $7,500 · OtherBRONX SCIENCE ALUMNI FOUNDATIONFAIRVIEW FOREST HOMEOWNERS' ASSOC — $5,020 · OtherFAIRVIEW FOREST HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCALUMNI ASSOC BRONX HS OF SCIENCE — $2,500 · Other+40 more — $19,638 · Other+40 moreCAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC — $19,000 · Arts & CultureCAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INCWESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIO — $9,664 · Arts & CultureWESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIOASHEVILLE WATCHDOG — $7,000 · Arts & CultureASHEVILLE WATCHDOGAsheville Art Museum Association Inc — $6,545 · Arts & CultureAsheville Art Museum Association IncWILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY INC — $3,900 · Arts & CultureWILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY INC+4 more — $1,480 · Arts & CultureMountainTrue — $10,600 · EnvironmentMountainTrueBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $8,750 · EnvironmentBLUE RIDGE PARKW…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $820 · Environment+1 more — $430 · EnvironmentUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc — $12,000 · EducationUniversity at B…WARREN WILSON COLLEGE — $5,500 · EducationWARREN WILSON C…SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $700 · EducationSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,450 · Crime & LegalNORTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC — $110 · Crime & LegalMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $900 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FAIRVIEW INCORPORATED — $100 · Food & NutritionASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $700 · Animals
Other$51,533Arts & Culture$47,589Environment$20,600Education$19,200Crime & Legal$1,560Food & Nutrition$1,000Animals$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC — $19,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc — $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMountainTrue — $10,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIO — $9,664 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $8,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetASHEVILLE WATCHDOG — $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAsheville Art Museum Association Inc — $6,545 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY INC — $3,900 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $1,450 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Together — $905 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $820 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGuardian Foundation Inc — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe North Carolina Arboretum Society — $430 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $423 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $259 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NOTRE-DAME DE PARIS INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA — $160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIANORG FOUNDATION — $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC — $110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR FAIRVIEW INCORPORATED — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAROLINA PUBLIC PRESS INC
  • Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc
  • Who funds MountainTrue
  • Who funds WESTERN N CAROLINA PUBLIC RADIO
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE WATCHDOG
  • Who funds Asheville Art Museum Association Inc
  • Who funds WARREN WILSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds WILMA DYKEMAN LEGACY INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Literacy Together
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Guardian Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The North Carolina Arboretum Society

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina IncNC23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Deerfield Episcopal Retirement Community Inc · James a and Mayme H Rowland Foundation · The Frances & William H Beattie Fdn · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Henderson County Inc · Dogwood Health Trust · The Goodman Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ruth & Jacques Sartisky Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph