Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ruth and Earl Scott Charitable Trust Samuel Scott Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$262kArts & Culture$91kEducation$71kInternational$65kHealth$39kFood & Nutrition$38kCivil Rights$18kHousing & Shelter$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA$28,000
FRIENDS OF OFANIM INC$15,000
THE BALDWIN SCHOOL$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN$5,000
WHYY INC$3,000
FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,000
US FUND FOR UNICEF$2,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$2,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVIC$2,000
PHILABUNDANCE$2,000
MANNA$1,000
ANNE FRANK CENTER$1,000
EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING$1,000
THE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPAN$1,000
PROJECT HOME$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING: $1k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $2k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $3k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $2k → 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $2k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $1k → 22%FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$347k · 18 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$347k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+38%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +3%
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $45k · revenue +24%
  • TB
    THE BALDWIN SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISREAL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • CR
    CICERO RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • FD
    FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
2
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
3
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
4
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
9
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $224,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPH…THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA: $28,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATE…FREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION - FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA: $27,000 · OtherFREE LIBRARY FOUNDATION - F…FRIENDS OF ISREAL DEFENSE FORCES: $14,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISREAL DEFENSE F…Individual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherPROJECT HOME: $17,000 · OtherPROJECT HOMEJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $6,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $18,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUESANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATI…PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $7,500 · Other+14 more: $28,000 · Other+14 moreBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE: $59,000 · Arts & CultureBRYN MAWR THEAT…WHYY INC: $27,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $45,000 · InternationalThe America…FRIENDS OF OFANIM INC: $15,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,000 · InternationalUNITED STAT…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL: $41,000 · EducationPhilabundance: $19,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $17,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA: $34,000 · Health
Philanthropy$234,000Other$163,000Arts & Culture$89,000International$65,000Education$41,000Food & Nutrition$37,500Health$34,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $224,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE: $59,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTONALITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeward Bound of Marin: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARRETT WILLIAMSON: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF OFANIM INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH BASKETBALL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES D/B/A FEDERATION EARLY LEARNING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TONALITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds GARRETT WILLIAMSON ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATING COMMUNITIES FOR PARENTING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruth and Earl Scott Charitable Trust Samuel Scott Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruth and Earl Scott Charitable Trust Samuel Scott Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruth and Earl Scott Charitable Trust Samuel Scott Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph