· Private foundation
Rutgers Community Health Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $191k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REACH OUT READ | $54,000 |
| ANSHE EMETH COMMUNITY DEV CORP | $37,500 |
| WOMEN AWARE | $25,000 |
| GIRLS ON THE RUN | $18,750 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MONMOUT | $18,000 |
| GNB MEALS ON WHEELS | $16,800 |
| ELIJAH'S PROMISE | $14,970 |
| SRECIAL STRIDES | $13,500 |
| GIRLS HELPING GIRLSPERIOD | $12,500 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $12,500 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS GREATER NEW BRUNSWI | $11,200 |
| NEW BRUNSWICK TOMORROW | $10,000 |
| COLAB ART | $9,170 |
| PRAB | $9,170 |
| GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK DAY CARE COUN | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $889k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EPElijahs Promise Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $345k · revenue +21%
- GNGREATER NEW BRUNSWICK DAY CARE COUNCIL INC7× · 2018–2025 · $274k · revenue +54%
- TRTHE ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $203k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- YEYOUTH EMPOWERMENT SERVICESone grant, 2020 · $50k
- 441700one grant, 2021 · $42k
- CMCNJ MATERNAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM GRANone grant, 2017 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.
Founded in 1982, the cooperative works to improve the system of care, maximize resources, address gaps in care and identify regional needs.
To provide shelter, food, medical and mental health care, legal services, educational and vocational services and an array of housing options, including transitional and permanent housing opportunities, for youth facing homelessness and…
Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.
The organization's mission is to provide households experiencing homelessness or are at risk of homelessness, an opportunity to achieve stability by providing comprehensive shelter diversion/homeless prevention, or transitional housing…
To promote an equitable and healthy future for families through services, advocacy, education, and collaboration.through collaboration with hospitals, educators, public health agencies, community-based organizations, consumers, and health…
Our mission is to help hospitals, nonprofits and government improve the health and well being of communities.
Our mission is the prevention of domestic violence through the protection and empowerment of the victim, the rehabilitation of family members, the advocacy for social reform to prevent partner violence, and the education of the public…
Rwj barnabas health, inc. operates as the parent entity of a tax-exempt multi-entity healthcare system. the organization coordinates, supervises and ensures the continuation and improvement of the quality of healthcare services in a cost…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Great Expectations Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc ↗
- Who funds Elijahs Promise Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK DAY CARE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Brunswick Tomorrow ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN AWARE INC ↗
- Who funds COLAB ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds RARITAN VALLEY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION A NJ NON PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HARK-ALS INC ↗
- Who funds HOMESHARING INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL STRIDES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS HELPING GIRLS PERIOD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Magyarbank Charitable Foundation · Oceanfirst Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Amboy Foundation · The Provident Bank Foundation · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · New Brunswick Tomorrow · Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rutgers Community Health Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Brunswick Tomorrow — 74% of income from government
- Women Aware Inc — 43% of income from government
- Colab Arts Inc — 6% of income from government
- Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc — 4% of income from government
- Special Strides Inc — 2% of income from government
- Elijahs Promise Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rutgers Community Health Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Rutgers Community Health Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.