Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

New Brunswick Tomorrow

Through a shared value of community and partnership, we bring diverse interest to the table to inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.

$535k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$2.8MHuman Services$2.3MCommunity Improvement$878kEducation$330kHousing & Shelter$165kArts & Culture$125kCrime & Legal$95kPublic Safety & Disaster$90kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $314,567 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $534,860 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $220,293 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $126k
$32,958
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD$125,950
RISING TIDE CAPITAL INC$49,800
COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NJ INC$45,695
CoLAB Arts$32,958
New Brunswick Education Foundation$21,500
Elijah's Promise$19,800
Pizza City$12,864
Suydam Street Reformed Church$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $606k → 12%URBAN REVIVAL PROJECT: $10k → 5%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $489k → 12%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $966k → 8%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $422k → 12%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $728k → 8%YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC: $95k → 12%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $606k → 8%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $542k → 8%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $235k → 8%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $174k → 8%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $134k → 8%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $126k → 8%PUERTO RICAN ACTION BOARD: $26k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 11 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$6.5M
$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+26%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YA
    YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +33%
  • COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $241k · revenue +27%
  • COLAB ARTS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $125k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ASSET PRESERVATION CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $165k · revenue +125%
  • NB
    NATIONAL BOWHUNTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $66k · revenue +3%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP
    one grant, 2020 · $45k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newark Alliance Inc

To work in partnership to make newark a better, safer place to work, live, learn, play, and do business.

Philanthropy
2
YouthBuild Newark Inc

To harness the intelligence and positive energy of low-income young people to rebuild their community and their lives.

Youth Development
3
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
4
Urban Affairs Coalition

Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…

5
Camden County Workforce Development Boar

To create the best customer-driven delivery system for employment, training and education-related programs and services by providing strategic management, planning, implementation and evaluation to enhance the region's long term economic…

Community Improvement
6
Probation Association of New Jersey Education Fund Inc
7
New Jersey Citizen Action Education Fund Inc

Promotes empowerment of low and middle income people through research, education, and training around public policy issues and direct counseling services.

Public Benefit
8
Youth Enrichment Services Inc

Youth enrichment services, inc. was founded in 1994 for the purpose of providing at-risk teens and low-income families residing in allegheny county a comprehensive in-home peer mentoring program, juvenile alternative to detention,…

Human Services
9
The Work Group Inc

The work group provides at-risk youth in transition to adulthood with the resources they need to become self-directed, self-sufficient individuals and productive, responsible members of their families and communities.

10
Nj Leep Inc

Nj leep is a college access and success program serving low-income and first-generation students in the greater newark area. our college bound program empowers students with the academic and social-emotional skills to succeed in college…

Education
11
Prevent Child Abuse- New Jersey Chapter Inc

We build a brighter future for children by promoting family wellness, positive parenting, healthy child development and nurturing communities.

12
Community Action Partnership of Greater St Joseph

Helping people, changing lives, engaging the community to end poverty

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Advocate Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Bowhunter Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc — $3,536,739 · Human ServicesJunta De Accion Puertorriquena IncYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC — $1,612,617 · Human ServicesYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC+1 more — $10,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK — $324,304 · OtherCITY OF NEW B…RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY — $117,060 · OtherRUTGERS THE S…NATIONAL BOWHUNTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $65,750 · OtherNATIONAL BOWH…SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP — $45,000 · OtherSALVATION ARM…CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF METUCHEN — $45,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHAR…HOLY FAMILY PARISH — $45,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY P…RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · Other+9 more — $123,689 · Other+9 moreCOMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC — $241,025 · Community ImprovementRISING TIDE CAPITAL INC AND SUBSIDIARIES — $213,800 · Community ImprovementNEW BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $173,050 · EducationCOMMUNITY ASSET PRESERVATION CORPORATION — $165,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLAB ARTS INC — $125,026 · Arts & CultureElijahs Promise Inc — $63,909 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$5,159,356Other$805,803Community Improvement$454,825Education$173,050Housing & Shelter$165,000Arts & Culture$125,026Food & Nutrition$63,909

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJunta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc — $3,536,739 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetYOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC — $1,612,617 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC — $241,025 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetRISING TIDE CAPITAL INC AND SUBSIDIARIES — $213,800 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNEW BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $173,050 over 4y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSET PRESERVATION CORPORATION — $165,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOLAB ARTS INC — $125,026 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetNATIONAL BOWHUNTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $65,750 over 1y, 25% of budgetElijahs Promise Inc — $63,909 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF METUCHEN — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN REVIVAL PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc
  • Who funds YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LOAN FUND OF NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds RISING TIDE CAPITAL INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
  • Who funds NEW BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSET PRESERVATION CORPORATION
  • Who funds COLAB ARTS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL BOWHUNTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Elijahs Promise Inc
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF METUCHEN
  • Who funds URBAN REVIVAL PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Oceanfirst Foundation · Rutgers Community Health Foundation Inc · Catholic Charities Diocese of Metuchen · Columbia Bank Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Brunswick Tomorrow funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Colab Arts Inc6% of income from government
  • Junta De Accion Puertorriquena Inc4% of income from government
  • Community Loan Fund of New Jersey Inc3% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities Diocese of Metuchen3% of income from government
  • Rising Tide Capital Inc and Subsidiaries2% of income from government
  • Elijahs Promise Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New Brunswick Tomorrow?

Find your warmest path to New Brunswick Tomorrow through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph