Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Rush County Community Foundation Inc

The rush county community foundation, the foundation of rush county's future, is a nonprofit public charity established in 1991 to serve donors, award grants and scholarships, and provide leadership to cultivate resources to enhance life in rush county, indiana.

$7.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$6.7MRecreation & Sports$3.2MYouth Development$1.2MEducation$614kReligion$407kPublic Safety & Disaster$199kHealth$198kFood & Nutrition$171kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 32 grants below total $7,071,832 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,443,083 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $371,251 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $403k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.6M
$11,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REC BUILDING HOLDING CORP$6,602,772
RCHS ACTIVITIES FUND$44,784
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH COUNTY$42,912
ST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$32,361
CLEAN GREEN RUSH$30,000
RUSHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$23,777
RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES$21,377
EAST HILL CEMETERY CO$19,451
RUSHVILLE AMERICAN LEGION POST 150 LTD$18,690
RUSHVILLE ELEMENTRY SCHOOL$18,506
RUSHVILLE TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$15,750
GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA$15,000
MILROY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$12,500
RUSH COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$12,391
ST MARY CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$11,647
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%HUFFER MEMORIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER: $60k → 19%HUFFER CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL: $25k → 19%FIREFLY CHILDREN & FAMILY ALLIANCE: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S BUREAU: $9k → 16%MILROY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 12%RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $21k → 12%RUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC: $12k → 12%RUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC: $11k → 12%RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $10k → 12%RUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC: $10k → 12%RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $9k → 12%RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $8k → 12%RUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC: $8k → 12%RUSH CO VICTIMS ASSISTANCE INC: $7k → 12%RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $7k → 12%RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 36 repeat orgs$6.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
13

Total granted

$6.2M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+10%

Still filing today

47%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterHealthMembership BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH CO INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $248k · revenue +118%
  • RP
    RUSHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $202k · revenue +65%
  • RM
    Rush Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $98k · revenue +285% · 31% of their budget

Funded once

  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $65k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS
    one grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue +10%
  • RA
    RUSH AIC RECOVERY HOUSING INC
    one grant, 2017 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raleigh Fire Department Inc

Provide fire and EMS services to all or part of 5 townships in Rush Co. IN

2
Rush County United Fund

To provide grants to service organizations

Human Services
3
Rush County Youth Baseball Inc

Local Youth Little League Program

4
Ravalli County Recycling Inc

Recycling

Environment
5
Rush Fire Department Inc

Provide fire, ambulance and rescue service to the town of rush, new york

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Rusk Volunteer Fire Department

Our mission is to engage in firefighting and similar disaster assistance.

7
Rush Corporation

Housing assistance

8
Rosehill Cemetery Association Inc

Maintain and operate the cemetery

9
Russell County Food Pantry

Distribute food to the needy of the community throughout the year.

Food & Nutrition
10
Rush County Community Foundation Inc

The rush county community foundation, the foundation of rush county's future, is a nonprofit public charity established in 1991 to serve donors, award grants and scholarships, and provide leadership to cultivate resources to enhance life…

Philanthropy
11
Northern Rush County Schools Inc

Provide free public education to students grades pre-k through 8th.

Education
12
Rush University System for Health Self-Insurance Trust

Provide self-insurance funds to exempt organization.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mentors of Rush Co Empowering Youth and the most unlike its peers is Rec Holding Building Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%5%<5yr12%13%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr11%23%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr28%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%71%<5yr12%1%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr11%13%20–35yr16%8%35–55yr28%5%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 71% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
10%
9/88

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REC Holding Building Corp — $6,602,772 · Community ImprovementREC Holding Building Corp+1 more — $11,133 · Community ImprovementCITY OF RUSHVILLE — $3,108,447 · OtherCITY OF RUSHVILLEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA — $901,967 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICAST PAUL'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $267,962 · OtherRCHS ACTIVITIES FUND — $217,140 · OtherRUSHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $202,109 · Other+34 more — $1,066,755 · Other+34 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH CO INC — $248,361 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SHELBYVILLE SHELBY COUNTY — $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORS OF RUSH CO EMPOWERING YOUTH — $22,373 · Youth DevelopmentHUFFER MEMORIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $85,000 · Human ServicesRUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC — $60,989 · Human ServicesRUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC — $45,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC — $19,000 · Human Services+1 more — $7,250 · Human ServicesRush Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc — $98,120 · HealthGLENWOOD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $67,735 · Public Safety & DisasterMANILLA COMMUNITY FIRE DEPT INC — $22,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSHARES INC — $14,467 · Education
Community Improvement$6,613,905Other$5,764,380Youth Development$298,234Human Services$217,739Health$98,120Public Safety & Disaster$89,735Education$14,467

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREC Holding Building Corp — $6,602,772 over 1y, 25% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH CO INC — $248,361 over 5y, 19% of budgetRUSHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY — $202,109 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetRush Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc — $98,120 over 6y, 31% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $93,490 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHUFFER MEMORIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $85,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetRushville St Mary Catholic School Foundation Inc — $84,741 over 8y, 79% of budgetGLENWOOD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $67,735 over 3y, 24% of budgetRUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC — $60,989 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetBPOE Lodge No 1307 Rushville Indiana Elks — $60,392 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetEast Hill Cemetery Company of Rushville — $50,346 over 4y, 11% of budgetRUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC — $45,500 over 4y, 15% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SHELBYVILLE SHELBY COUNTY — $27,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMENTORS OF RUSH CO EMPOWERING YOUTH — $22,373 over 2y, 33% of budgetMANILLA COMMUNITY FIRE DEPT INC — $22,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN'S BUREAU INC — $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARES INC — $14,467 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEART OF RUSHVILLE INC — $11,133 over 2y, 13% of budgetRUSH COUNTY VICTIM'S ASSISTANCEINC — $7,250 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSOULMEDIC MEDIA GROUP INC — $6,568 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRush County Economic and Community Development Corporation — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds REC Holding Building Corp
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RUSH CO INC
  • Who funds RUSHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds Rush Memorial Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds HUFFER MEMORIAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds Rushville St Mary Catholic School Foundation Inc
  • Who funds GLENWOOD VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds RUSH COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS
  • Who funds BPOE Lodge No 1307 Rushville Indiana Elks
  • Who funds East Hill Cemetery Company of Rushville
  • Who funds RUSH COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE INC
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SHELBYVILLE SHELBY COUNTY
  • Who funds MENTORS OF RUSH CO EMPOWERING YOUTH
  • Who funds MANILLA COMMUNITY FIRE DEPT INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BUREAU INC
  • Who funds SHARES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue River Foundation IncIN13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue River Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rush County Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph