Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rush and Kathryn Adams Limbaugh Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$5.8MPublic Benefit$3.0MHealth$1.2MInternational$175kHuman Services$170kAnimals$145kYouth Development$125kPhilanthropy$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CURETIVITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
MARINE CORPS LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION$260,000
K9S FOR WARRIORS$30,000
NELSON MULLINS RILEY SCABOROUGH FUND$20,318
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE MASTER'S UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$5,000
KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
CORNERSTONE UNIVERSITY$5,000
US MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY$5,000
JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MOMS FOR AMERICA: $25k → 14%OPERATION DEPLOYED INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CT
NE
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 4 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
141

Total granted

$3.6M
$7.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Curetivity Foundation
    3× · 2022–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +81%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +97%
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $660k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • BR
    BETSY ROSS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3.0M · revenue 0%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2.0M · revenue ×12
  • GA
    GARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
6
Command and General Staff College Foundation Inc

The cgsc foundation supports the united states army command and general staff college in educating leaders for the 21st century in the following six mission areas: enrich the college's academic environment; foster a strong relationship…

Education
7
Naval War College Foundation Inc

Help the naval war college to: a. develop strategic and operational leaders: provide professional military education programs that are current, rigorous, relevant, and accessible to the maximum number of qualified u.s. officers and navy…

Education
8
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
9
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
10
Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc

To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.

Education
11
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
12
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Patrol Police & Business Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETSY ROSS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000,000 · OtherBETSY ROSS FOUNDATION INC+139 more: $1,570,318 · Other+139 moreThe Curetivity Foundation: $1,600,000 · HealthThe Curetivity FoundationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,200,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOW…MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC: $660,000 · EducationMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT…+6 more: $40,000 · EducationGARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION: $175,000 · PhilanthropyHelping a HeroOrg: $100,000 · PhilanthropyK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $95,000 · AnimalsDELMAR FARM SANCTUARY INC: $50,000 · AnimalsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentAmerica's Future Foundation: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION 300 INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMAHOMET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH PATROL POLICE & BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP: $7,500 · Community ImprovementMoms for America Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION DEPLOYED INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$4,570,318Health$2,800,000Education$2,700,000Philanthropy$275,000Animals$145,000Youth Development$135,000Community Improvement$57,500Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetThe Curetivity Foundation: $1,600,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC: $660,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetGARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHelping a HeroOrg: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerica's Future Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMAHOMET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetDELMAR FARM SANCTUARY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMoms for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION DEPLOYED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOPERATION 300 INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH PATROL POLICE & BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP: $7,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETSY ROSS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Curetivity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY AND VIVIENNE PLAYER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Helping a HeroOrg ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds America's Future Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAHOMET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DELMAR FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Moms for America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rush and Kathryn Adams Limbaugh Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rush and Kathryn Adams Limbaugh Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Jacksonville University: 3% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 161 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rush and Kathryn Adams Limbaugh Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph