Skip to content

· Public charity

Rural Economic Development Center Inc

We champion rural north carolina by investing in people, communities and potentialand envision a rural north carolina where every rural voice matters and every ruralcommunity thrives.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Community Improvement$7.3MFood & Nutrition$977kReligion$634kHuman Services$13kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $293k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $363k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.8M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$309M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY SMALL BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT C$1,826,647
MDC INC$218,412
COOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP$95,000
BLACKBURNS CHAPEL UMC$50,000
FIRST UMC (FRANKLIN)$30,000
CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
BETHESDA UMC$30,000
FIRST UMC (MURPHY)$20,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$13,401
PLANK CHAPEL UMC$10,000
ABUNDANT LIFE MIRACLE CENTER$10,000
FAIRVIEW UMC$10,000
SHARON MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
BLUESTONE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
LC GRAVES MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $450k → 8%PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $725k → 9%CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $215k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 15%PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $250k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 6 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$3.8M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-1%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $975k · revenue +23%
  • CC
    CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $665k · revenue +12% · 31% of their budget
  • BE
    Business Expansion Funding Corp
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IC
    INSTITUTE CAPITAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $775k · revenue -47%
  • MB
    MOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $736k · revenue +57%
  • Carolina Small Business Development Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Appalachian Community Capital Development Foundation

To increase small business lending by providing appalachian member institutions that serve underserved people and communities with new sources of capital.

Philanthropy
2
Appalachian Development Corporation

Adc is a nonprofit organization formed to further the economic development of south carolina by providing multiple financing options to qualified small businesses.

—
3
South Carolina Community Capital Alliance

Our mission is to facilitate the investment of capital in south carolina in order to improve the quality of life for all her citizens by providing responsible and affordable financial products and services that are a major catalyst for…

Community Improvement
4
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
5
Carolina Common Enterprise

The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…

Community Improvement
6
Acc Capital Inc

Acc capital is a private nonprofit financial leader on a mission for economic change. we are dedicated to empowering entrepreneurs and uplifting communities with accessible loans, resources, and over 68 years of experience.

—
7
Southern Bancorp Capital Partners

Creating economic opportunities in distressed rural communities.

—
8
Center for Economic Empowerment and Development

To promote both small business and personal growth, productiveness and well being through loans, peer counseling, education, information, and other advocacy programs throughout cumberland county, north carolina.

—
9
Catawba Regional Council of Governments

To serve the state, member counties, municipalities and local community with job growth, employee training, and community development, planning services and economic development support.

Community Improvement
10
North Carolina Community Development Initiative Inc

North carolina community development initiative is a statewide public- private partnership that provides leadership and capital investment to high-performance community development corporations (cdcs) as well as other comminity based…

—
11
Barberton Community Development Corporation

To provide assistance to small businesses

Community Improvement
12
Small Business Development Corporation of Orange County

To provide financial assistance to small businesses. the organization is primarily involved in economic development lending activities providing state loan guarantees to bank and non-bank lenders through the state loan guarantee program…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thread Capital Inc; the most unlike its peers is F I R S T. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $1,826,647 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYBusiness Expansion Funding Corp: $550,000 · OtherBusiness Expansion Funding CorpUP COMMUNITY FUND LLC: $475,000 · OtherUP COMMUNITY FUND LLCGENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE & ADMINS OF THE UNITED: $451,015 · OtherGENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE & ADMINS OF THE UNITEDMOUNTAIN BIZWORKS-CDFI: $250,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN BIZWORKS-CDFIMDC INC: $218,412 · Other+24 more: $430,000 · Other+24 moreINSTITUTE CAPITAL INC: $775,000 · Community ImprovementINSTITUTE CAPITAL INCARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $726,747 · Community ImprovementARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPM…THREAD CAPITAL INC: $250,000 · Community ImprovementTHREAD CAPITAL INCPiedmont Business Capital: $100,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $47,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $975,000 · Human ServicesPARTNER COMMUNITY CAP…CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $665,150 · Human ServicesCAROLINA COMMUNITY IM…+1 more: $13,401 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC: $736,000 · PhilanthropyMOUNTAIN …Carolina Small Business Development Fund: $400,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,201,074Community Improvement$1,898,747Human Services$1,653,551Philanthropy$736,000Public Benefit$400,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $975,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetINSTITUTE CAPITAL INC: $775,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC: $736,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $726,747 over 2y, 77% of budgetCAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $665,150 over 2y, 31% of budgetBusiness Expansion Funding Corp: $550,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCarolina Small Business Development Fund: $400,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHREAD CAPITAL INC: $250,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMDC INC: $218,412 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPiedmont Business Capital: $100,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE SEQUOYAH FUND INC: $47,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetF I R S T: $13,401 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnnie Penn Memorial Hospital Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds Business Expansion Funding Corp ↗
  • Who funds Carolina Small Business Development Fund ↗
  • Who funds THREAD CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MDC INC ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Business Capital ↗
  • Who funds THE SEQUOYAH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds F I R S T ↗
  • Who funds Annie Penn Memorial Hospital Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nc IdeaNC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nc Idea · Dogwood Health Trust · Appalachian Community Capital Corporation · The Golden Leaf Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rural Economic Development Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rural Economic Development Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rural Economic Development Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph