Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rural Economic Development Center Inc

We champion rural north carolina by investing in people, communities and potentialand envision a rural north carolina where every rural voice matters and every ruralcommunity thrives.

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Community Improvement$7.3MFood & Nutrition$977kReligion$634kHuman Services$13kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $293k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $363k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.8M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$309M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY SMALL BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT C$1,826,647
MDC INC$218,412
COOPERATIVE BAPTIST FELLOWSHIP$95,000
BLACKBURNS CHAPEL UMC$50,000
CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$30,000
FIRST UMC (FRANKLIN)$30,000
BETHESDA UMC$30,000
FIRST UMC (MURPHY)$20,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$13,401
BLUESTONE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
LAUREL HILL UMC$10,000
PROSPECT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
OAK HILL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
PLANK CHAPEL UMC$10,000
LC GRAVES MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $450k → 8%PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $725k → 9%CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $215k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 15%PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC: $250k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 6 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$3.8M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-1%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $975k · revenue +23%
  • CC
    CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $665k · revenue +12% · 31% of their budget
  • BE
    Business Expansion Funding Corp
    2× · 2023–2024 · $550k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • IC
    INSTITUTE CAPITAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $775k · revenue -47%
  • MB
    MOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $736k · revenue +57%
  • Carolina Small Business Development Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Appalachian Community Capital Development Foundation

To increase small business lending by providing appalachian member institutions that serve underserved people and communities with new sources of capital.

Philanthropy
2
Appalachian Development Corporation

Adc is a nonprofit organization formed to further the economic development of south carolina by providing multiple financing options to qualified small businesses.

3
South Carolina Community Capital Alliance

Our mission is to facilitate the investment of capital in south carolina in order to improve the quality of life for all her citizens by providing responsible and affordable financial products and services that are a major catalyst for…

Community Improvement
4
First Community Capital Inc

First Community Capital, Inc. (FCCI) is a certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) dedicated to expanding access to affordable capital and technical assistance for small businesses and individuals, with a focus on low-…

Employment
5
Carolina Common Enterprise

The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…

Community Improvement
6
Acc Capital Inc

Acc capital is a private nonprofit financial leader on a mission for economic change. we are dedicated to empowering entrepreneurs and uplifting communities with accessible loans, resources, and over 68 years of experience.

7
Southern Bancorp Capital Partners

Creating economic opportunities in distressed rural communities.

8
Center for Economic Empowerment and Development

To promote both small business and personal growth, productiveness and well being through loans, peer counseling, education, information, and other advocacy programs throughout cumberland county, north carolina.

9
Catawba Regional Council of Governments

To serve the state, member counties, municipalities and local community with job growth, employee training, and community development, planning services and economic development support.

Community Improvement
10
North Carolina Community Development Initiative Inc

North carolina community development initiative is a statewide public- private partnership that provides leadership and capital investment to high-performance community development corporations (cdcs) as well as other comminity based…

11
Barberton Community Development Corporation

To provide assistance to small businesses

Community Improvement
12
Small Business Development Corporation of Orange County

To provide financial assistance to small businesses. the organization is primarily involved in economic development lending activities providing state loan guarantees to bank and non-bank lenders through the state loan guarantee program…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thread Capital Inc and the most unlike its peers is F I R S T. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NC STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,826,647 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYBusiness Expansion Funding Corp — $550,000 · OtherBusiness Expansion Funding CorpUP COMMUNITY FUND LLC — $475,000 · OtherUP COMMUNITY FUND LLCGENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE & ADMINS OF THE UNITED — $451,015 · OtherGENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE & ADMINS OF THE UNITEDMOUNTAIN BIZWORKS-CDFI — $250,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN BIZWORKS-CDFIMDC INC — $218,412 · Other+24 more — $430,000 · Other+24 moreINSTITUTE CAPITAL INC — $775,000 · Community ImprovementINSTITUTE CAPITAL INCARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $726,747 · Community ImprovementARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPM…THREAD CAPITAL INC — $250,000 · Community ImprovementTHREAD CAPITAL INCPiedmont Business Capital — $100,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $47,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC — $975,000 · Human ServicesPARTNER COMMUNITY CAP…CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC — $665,150 · Human ServicesCAROLINA COMMUNITY IM…+1 more — $13,401 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC — $736,000 · PhilanthropyMOUNTAIN …Carolina Small Business Development Fund — $400,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,201,074Community Improvement$1,898,747Human Services$1,653,551Philanthropy$736,000Public Benefit$400,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC — $975,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetINSTITUTE CAPITAL INC — $775,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC — $736,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $726,747 over 2y, 77% of budgetCAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC — $665,150 over 2y, 31% of budgetBusiness Expansion Funding Corp — $550,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCarolina Small Business Development Fund — $400,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHREAD CAPITAL INC — $250,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMDC INC — $218,412 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPiedmont Business Capital — $100,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE SEQUOYAH FUND INC — $47,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetF I R S T — $13,401 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnnie Penn Memorial Hospital Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE CAPITAL INC
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN BIZCAPITAL INC
  • Who funds ARRAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • Who funds CAROLINA COMMUNITY IMPACT INC
  • Who funds Business Expansion Funding Corp
  • Who funds Carolina Small Business Development Fund
  • Who funds THREAD CAPITAL INC
  • Who funds MDC INC
  • Who funds Piedmont Business Capital
  • Who funds THE SEQUOYAH FUND INC
  • Who funds F I R S T
  • Who funds Annie Penn Memorial Hospital Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nc IdeaNC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nc Idea · Dogwood Health Trust · Appalachian Community Capital Corporation · The Golden Leaf Inc · Truist Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rural Economic Development Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph