Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rumsfeld Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$604k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$355k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$2.4MEducation$1.6MHuman Services$844kPhilanthropy$141kScience & Tech$70kPublic Benefit$45kCommunity Improvement$30kAnimals$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $127k
  • $250k+1 grant · $355k
$4,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$420k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Council$355,085
CAMCA GROUP INC$127,000
Individual grant recipient$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,500
Johns Hopkins University$10,000
The Institute of World Politics$10,000
Georgetown University$5,536
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Heroes and Horses: $50k → 10%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%Boulder Crest Foundation: $20k → 7%Warrior Expeditions: $5k → 8%Boulder Crest Foundation: $10k → 7%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%THE COMMIT FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%BOULDER CREST RETREAT: $10k → 7%CODE OF SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%BOULDER CREST RETREAT: $10k → 7%The COMMIT Foundation: $8k → 10%HEROES AND HORSES: $5k → 10%HEROES AND HORSES: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 95 repeat orgs$544k to everyone else

95 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

95
65

Total granted

$4.7M
$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+58%

Still filing today

23%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +11%
  • TM
    Travis Manion Foundation
    3× · 2017–2021 · $545k · revenue +235%
  • OM
    OUR MILITARY KIDS INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $85k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $38k
  • PO
    PROGRAM ON CONSTITUTIONALISM DEMOCRACY
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Naval War College Foundation Inc

Help the naval war college to: a. develop strategic and operational leaders: provide professional military education programs that are current, rigorous, relevant, and accessible to the maximum number of qualified u.s. officers and navy…

Education
6
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
9
Us Naval Academy Foundation Inc

To support, promote, and advance the mission of the naval academy.

Education
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
12
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Operations Warrior Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Camca Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL: $2,178,233 · InternationalAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCILCAMCA GROUP INC: $127,000 · InternationalTHE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS: $84,000 · International+1 more: $45,000 · International+144 more: $1,545,884 · Other+144 moreTravis Manion Foundation: $545,000 · PhilanthropyTravis Manion…OUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $85,000 · PhilanthropyOUR MILITARY …+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $79,589 · EducationClaremont Graduate University: $55,451 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $46,531 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,450 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $19,500 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationMILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION: $10,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 · EducationSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $9,530 · EducationHEROES AND HORSES INC: $57,500 · Human ServicesBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMIT FOUNDATION: $22,500 · Human ServicesCode of Support Foundation: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesLUKE'S WINGS: $52,000 · HealthWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $10,000 · HealthDOG TAG INC: $35,000 · Employment
International$2,434,233Other$1,545,884Philanthropy$635,000Education$291,051Human Services$185,000Health$104,500Employment$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL: $2,178,233 over 7y, 14% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation: $545,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCAMCA GROUP INC: $127,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS: $84,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $79,589 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES AND HORSES INC: $57,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetClaremont Graduate University: $55,451 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE'S WINGS: $52,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $46,531 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOG TAG INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBUNKER LABS NFP INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHANKS USA: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COMMIT FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY CHILD EDUCATION COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCode of Support Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONORING OUR FALLEN: $7,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWARRIOR EXPEDITIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetARCADIA FOOD INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,591 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAMCA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR MILITARY KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF WORLD POLITICS ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEROES AND HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds Claremont Graduate University ↗
  • Who funds LUKE'S WINGS ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DOG TAG INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BUNKER LABS NFP INC ↗
  • Who funds THANKS USA ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMIT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · The Pentagon Federal Credit Union Foundation · Wounded Warrior Project Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rumsfeld Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rumsfeld Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rumsfeld Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rumsfeld Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 173 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rumsfeld’s filings →

More from the funding graph