Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fosforo Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$604kArts & Culture$214kHealth$146kEnvironment$92kRecreation & Sports$86kEmployment$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$954
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAIRYKUTZI COMUNIDAD Y DESAROLLO$20,000
CANCER ACTION INC$3,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%National Alliance on Mental Illness NAMI South Shore: $2k → 8%Celtic FC Foundation Inc: $3k → 16%Safe Haven of Greater Waterbury: $3k → 12%Equestrian Connection NFP: $25k → 8%USBG Nat'L Charity Foundation: $10k → 13%Safe Haven of Greater Waterbury: $3k → 12%Omni Youth Services Incorporated: $10k → 8%Equestrian Connection NFP: $10k → 8%Variety The Childrens Charity of the Desert: $8k → 11%Omni Youth Services Incorporated: $5k → 8%Equestrian Connection NFP: $5k → 8%Omni Youth Services Incorporated: $3k → 8%Equestrian Connection NFP: $5k → 8%Omni Youth Services Incorporated: $3k → 8%Riverside Foundation: $5k → 8%Riverside Foundation: $5k → 8%Riverside Foundation: $275 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
NJ
CT
CA
VA
KS
AR
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 20 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
45

Total granted

$1.1M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+41%

Still filing today

70%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY
    3× · 2017–2021 · $75k · revenue +23%
  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2020 · $58k · revenue +54%
  • LL
    LOVE & LOVE TENNIS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $46k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • AR
    American Red Cross
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CO
    Children of Restaurant Employees LTD
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
2
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
3
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
4
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
5
Camp for All Foundation

Camp For All transforms the world for children and adults with challenging illnesses, disabilities, or special needs.

Youth Development
6
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Foundation of the Arc of the United States

To promote, support and further the interests and purposes of the arc of the united states, inc.

8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

9
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Baldrick's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Veteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersClassical Music EnsemblesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Christian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community FederationsFood Pantries & AssistanceYouth Sports Booster Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%61%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
2/43
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION — $562,150 · EmploymentOPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATIONNAIRYKUTZI COMUNIDAD Y DESAROLLO — $90,000 · OtherNAIRYKUTZI COMUNIDAD Y DESARO…School of the Art Institute of Chicago — $40,000 · OtherSchool of the Art Institute o…SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $39,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOISIRA Education Foundation — $20,000 · OtherIRA Education FoundationAmerican Red Cross — $20,000 · OtherAmerican Red Cross+41 more — $126,202 · Other+41 moreEquestrian Connection NFP — $45,000 · Human ServicesEquestria…OMNI YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED — $20,000 · Human ServicesOMNI YOUT…RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION — $10,275 · Human ServicesRIVERSIDE…USBG NATIONAL CHARITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesUSBG NATI…Variety Childrens Charities of the Desert Tent 66 — $7,500 · Human ServicesVariety C…SAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC — $5,000 · Human Services+2 more — $4,500 · Human ServicesRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $58,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Broadcast Communications — $40,000 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $35,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,000 · HealthCancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester — $3,950 · Health+3 more — $3,000 · HealthLOVE & LOVE TENNIS FOUNDATION INC — $46,000 · Youth Development
Employment$562,150Other$335,202Human Services$102,275Arts & Culture$98,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Health$66,950Youth Development$46,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPERATION RED WINGS FOUNDATION — $562,150 over 5y, 10% of budgetPALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY — $75,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $58,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE & LOVE TENNIS FOUNDATION INC — $46,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetEquestrian Connection NFP — $45,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMuseum of Broadcast Communications — $40,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS — $39,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOMNI YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOTIS WILSON CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION — $11,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE FOUNDATION — $10,275 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BIANCA RAE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetNATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE ALUMNI INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUSBG NATIONAL CHARITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $9,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVariety Childrens Charities of the Desert Tent 66 — $7,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $5,810 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HAVEN OF GREATER WTBY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Action Inc DBA Cancer Support Community Rochester — $3,950 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNational Alliance on Mental Illness NAMI South Shore — $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKathy's House Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL LEISURE SERVICES FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOLD IRVING PARK COMMUNITY CLINIC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBJ'S RESTAURANTS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTAYA AND CHRIS KYLE FOUNDATION SERVICE FAMILY STRONG — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY OF IOWA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZON CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Cancer Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCO-CARE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEACHERS TREASURES INC — $255 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL17.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fosforo Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • United Cerebral Palsy of Central Florida Inc13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fosforo Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fosforo Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph