Skip to content
Rudolph & Hilda U Forchheimer Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rudolph & Hilda U Forchheimer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$648k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$415kEducation$277kFood & Nutrition$265kHuman Services$240kPhilanthropy$240kReligion$228kHealth$219kInternational$134kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $435k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY$75,000
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$75,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$50,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$35,000
HEBREW UNION COLLEGE$30,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$30,000
HIAS$30,000
MANNA FOOD CENTER$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$30,000
DOROT INC ATTN DEVELOPMENT$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATON$20,000
WESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE$20,000
UNION FOR REFORM JUDIASM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
NATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BLUE CARD INC: $8k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $8k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $8k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $5k → 17%THE BLUE CARD INC: $3k → 17%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%THE BLUE CARD INC: $3k → 17%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $10k → 9%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%DOROT INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
VA
MD
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 47 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
8

Total granted

$2.8M
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+261%

Still filing today

55%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $305k · revenue +135%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +39%
  • FW
    FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $175k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • WJ
    WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SC
    SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +261%
  • MT
    MARGARET TIETZ CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
Jewish Family Services of Greenwich

Jewish family services of greenwich (jfs) is a nonprofit social service agency dedicated to strengthening individuals and families in fairfield and new london counties. jfs provides behavioral health counseling, food security programs,…

—
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
The Jewish Federations of North America Inc

The federation movement protects and enhances the well-being of jews worldwide through the values of tikkun olam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and torah (jewish learning). the jewish federations of north…

Philanthropy
10
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Selfhelp Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION: $215,000 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGIONFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $175,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INCDOROT INC ATTN DEVELOPMENT: $105,000 · OtherDOROT INC ATTN DEVELOPMENTWESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE: $105,000 · OtherWESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLEUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $85,400 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISMAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMAN INSTITUTE OF SC: $75,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARKINSON FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATON: $60,000 · OtherPBS FOUNDATION ENDOWMENT FUND: $57,500 · OtherORT AMERICA INC: $51,800 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AMI: $50,000 · Other+28 more: $452,000 · Other+28 moreAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $305,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WE…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $260,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION…HIAS INC: $120,000 · InternationalHIAS INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $45,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committe…+2 more: $13,500 · InternationalUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $285,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEW…SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE CARD INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesDOROT INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $145,000 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $70,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $50,000 · Civil RightsHIRE HEROES USA INC: $50,500 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $40,000 · Education
Other$1,496,700International$818,500Philanthropy$285,000Human Services$178,500Food & Nutrition$145,000Civil Rights$120,000Education$90,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $305,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $285,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $260,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $145,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHIAS INC: $120,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $51,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHIRE HEROES USA INC: $50,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC: $47,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERFAITH WORKS: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE: $30,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetDOROT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HIRE HEROES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE BLUE CARD INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH WORKS ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rudolph & Hilda U Forchheimer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rudolph & Hilda U Forchheimer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Interfaith Works: 4% of income from government
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rudolph & Hilda U Forchheimer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home