Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rucker Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$168k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$475kEnvironment$134kEducation$111kCommunity Improvement$46kScience & Tech$24kRecreation & Sports$22kPhilanthropy$22kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARK$64,045
PEORIA RIVERFRONT MUSEUM$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LEECH LAKE$5,138
BUILD THE HANNA CITY TRAIL$5,000
WCBU ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
BRADLEY UNIVERSITY$5,000
SPRINGDALE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$5,000
SUN FOUNDATION$5,000
MIT ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$2,500
MASS INST OF TECHNOLOGY SLOAN SCHOOL$2,500
TEXTILE CENTER$2,500
UNITED DRAG ALLIANCE$2,050
MACALASTER PLYMOUTH CHURCH$1,500
MOVE 2 LEARN$1,035
COLORADO COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%UNITED DRAG ALLIANCE: $2k → 8%PHOENIX COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MA
PA
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$836k · 43 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
20

Total granted

$836k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+26%

Still filing today

51%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    Peoria Riverfront Museum
    7× · 2018–2024 · $253k · revenue +123%
  • TW
    THE WORKS
    6× · 2018–2024 · $106k · revenue +51%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARK
    7× · 2018–2024 · $91k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • IS
    ILLINOIS STATE UNIV WCBU-FM
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • M
    MIT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • SS
    South Side Office of Concern
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
2
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
3
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
4
Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy

We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.

Recreation & Sports
5
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
6
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
7
Grand Rapids Public Museum

The grpm exists to be a living monument of artifacts, ideas and stories told through exhibitions, events, and educational programming designed to inspire, motivate and celebrate our human bond. we enrich the lives of our community through…

Arts & Culture
8
Museum of the Great Plains Authority

The museum of the great plains collects, preserves, interprets, and exhibits historical material relevant to the great plains of north america, fostering research into the region in order to increase knowledge of its history and to make…

Arts & Culture
9
Conservation Minnesota

Conservation minnesota's mission is to turn our shared conservation values into state priorities and provide you with the information you need to make decisions for your family, community and future.

Environment
10
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
11
Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois

To accelerate preserving and reusing significant places statewide to foster healthy, livable and thriving communities.

—
12
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trust for Public Land; the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Peoria Riverfront Museum: $253,000 · Arts & CulturePeoria Riverfront MuseumTHE WORKS: $106,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WORKSSPRINGDALE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGDALE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATIONCLASSICAL ACTORS ENSEMBLE: $19,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $13,600 · Arts & CultureST PAUL ACADEMY: $51,000 · OtherST PAUL ACADEMYCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL I…MASS INST OF TECHNOLOGY SLOAN SCHOOL: $19,500 · OtherMASS INST OF TECHNOLOGY SLOAN SCH…SUN FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherSUN FOUNDATIONWCBU ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherPEORIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,772 · Other+44 more: $128,325 · Other+44 moreFRIENDS OF WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARK: $90,545 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF W…+3 more: $4,550 · EnvironmentTOWERSIDE INNOVATION DISTRICT: $40,000 · Community ImprovementGREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INC: $9,000 · Community ImprovementACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $3,500 · Community Improvement+1 more: $1,000 · Community ImprovementBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $17,000 · EducationLOOK ITS MY BOOK: $7,900 · EducationMIGIZI Communications Inc: $6,000 · Education+4 more: $3,520 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC: $12,138 · Youth DevelopmentMove2Learn: $7,535 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED DRAG ALLIANCE: $2,050 · Human ServicesSouth Side Office of Concern: $2,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$419,600Other$258,597Environment$95,095Community Improvement$53,500Education$34,420Youth Development$19,673Human Services$4,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPeoria Riverfront Museum: $253,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTHE WORKS: $106,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARK: $90,545 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTOWERSIDE INNOVATION DISTRICT: $40,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetSPRINGDALE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC: $12,138 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPEORIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,772 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetGREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBUILD THE HANNA CITY TRAIL: $8,500 over 3y, 55% of budgetLOOK ITS MY BOOK: $7,900 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetMove2Learn: $7,535 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMIGIZI Communications Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELS O' TIME MUSEUM: $5,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACT FOR ALEXANDRIA: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmherst County Museum & Historical: $3,100 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED DRAG ALLIANCE: $2,050 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSouth Side Office of Concern: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH INTERFAITH IMPACT NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWEAVERS GUILD OF MINNESOTA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HIKING SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEORIA GARDEN CLUB: $550 over 1y, 21% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Peoria Riverfront Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WILDLIFE PRAIRIE PARK ↗
  • Who funds TOWERSIDE INNOVATION DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGDALE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLASSICAL ACTORS ENSEMBLE ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEECH LAKE AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEORIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILD THE HANNA CITY TRAIL ↗
  • Who funds LOOK ITS MY BOOK ↗
  • Who funds Move2Learn ↗
  • Who funds MIGIZI Communications Inc ↗
  • Who funds WHEELS O' TIME MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds KEEP PEORIA BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACT FOR ALEXANDRIA ↗
  • Who funds Amherst County Museum & Historical ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoria Area Community FoundationIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoria Area Community Foundation · Gilmore Foundation · Share Foundation · Doug and Diane Oberhelman Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rucker Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rucker Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • American Hiking Society: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rucker Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph