Skip to content
Ruah Retreat at the River at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Ruah Retreat at the River

TO SUPPORT AND ENCOURAGE SILENT AND GUIDED RETREATS AND RELATED CONTEMPLATIVE ACTIVITIES FOR INDIVIDUALS, GROUPS, AND FAMILIES BY PROVIDING FUNDING TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS OFFERING THESE ACTIVITIES OR TO INDIVIDUALS SEEKING TO PARTICIPATE IN THESE ACTIVITIES.

$183k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$103kYouth Development$79kInternational$55kEducation$30kReligion$25kArts & Culture$14kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RWANDA SHINES$30,000
BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES ORGANIZATION$27,500
YOUNG LIFE$22,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$20,000
CRESTMONT CHRISTIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL$20,000
MILLION LIVES GENOCIDE RELIEF FUND INC$20,000
CHURCHILL BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
ANY WOMAN CAN$10,000
URBAN HYMNAL INC$10,000
MWANA VILLAGES US INC$5,250
CRESTMONT PREP BOOSTER CLUB INC$5,000
CLASSICAL MUSIC INSTITUTE CMI$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MILLION LIVES GENOCIDE RELIEF FUND INC: $20k → 16%MWANA VILLAGES US INC: $5k → 16%BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES ORGANIZATION: $28k → 15%ANY WOMAN CAN LLC: $10k → 16%ANY WOMAN CAN: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 5 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$159k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-8%

Still filing today

40%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $79k · revenue +13%
  • TR
    THE RETREAT HOME FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2021–2022 · $35k
  • AW
    ANY WOMAN CAN NP
    2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • LT
    LIFE TIME FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
2
Salt With a Mission

Teach the ministry of christ

Religion
3
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
4
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
5
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
6
Christ Life Ministries

Christ Life Ministries' vision is transforming lives for Christ through the preaching of the gospel and discipleship.

Religion
7
Intimate Life Ministries
—
8
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
9
Life As Mission
Unclassified
10
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
11
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
12
Color Green Ministries

The mission of color green ministries is: to tell the world jesus loves them through art, movies and ministry.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Million Lives Genocide Relief Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG LIFE: $78,875 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES ORGANIZATION: $27,500 · Human ServicesBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES ORGAN…ANY WOMAN CAN NP: $20,000 · Human ServicesANY WOMAN CAN NPMILLION LIVES GENOCIDE RELIEF FUND: $20,000 · Human ServicesMILLION LIVES GENOCIDE REL…MWANA VILLAGES US INC: $5,250 · Human ServicesMWANA VILLAGES US INCCRESTMONT CHRISTIAN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherCRESTMONT CHRISTIAN PREPA…PIONEERS: $15,000 · OtherPIONEERSURBAN HYMNAL INC: $10,000 · OtherURBAN HYMNAL INCCRESTMONT PREP BOOSTER CLUB INC: $10,000 · OtherCRESTMONT PREP BOOSTER CL…CHURCHILL BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherCHURCHILL BAPTIST CHURCHClassical Music Institute CMI: $3,500 · OtherTHE RETREAT HOME FOR CHILDREN: $35,000 · Crime & LegalTHE RETREAT …RWANDA SHINES: $30,000 · InternationalRWANDA SHIN…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 · ReligionLIFE TIME FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education
Youth Development$78,875Human Services$72,750Other$68,500Crime & Legal$35,000International$30,000Religion$20,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $78,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RETREAT HOME FOR CHILDREN: $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRWANDA SHINES: $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetANY WOMAN CAN NP: $20,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMWANA VILLAGES US INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetClassical Music Institute CMI: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE TIME FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ruah Retreat at the River funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ruah Retreat at the River. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ruah Retreat at the River?

    Find your warmest path to Ruah Retreat at the River through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruah Retreat at the River’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home