Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rs Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$368kReligion$141kEmployment$30kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$100Recreation & Sports$62Environment$52
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$165k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OOLTEWAH SDA CHURCH$95,035
GHROW FOUNDATION INC$28,293
SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY$20,000
EDGEMERE SDA CHURCH$7,500
CHATTANOOGA AREA FOOD BANK$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,750
ASIA PACIFIC CAREER DEVELOPMENT$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($485k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($56k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EDGEMERE SDA CHURCH: $8k → 12%COLLEGEDALE ACADEMY: $10k → 12%FOSTER CHURCH: $10k → 12%CURE EPILEPSY: $100 → 14%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $54k → 12%TRIADELPHIA SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $100 → 6%TAKOMA ACADEMY: $16k → 8%ASIA PACIFIC CAREER DEVELOPMENT: $17k → 11%BLUE RIBBON MOVEMENT TRUST: $17k → 12%EDGEMERE SDA CHURCH: $5k → 12%SOUTHERN ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $54k → 12%GHROW FOUNDATION INC: $28k → 6%TAKOMA ACADEMY: $5k → 8%ASIA PACIFIC CAREER DEVELOPMENT: $13k → 11%BLUE RIBBON MOVEMENT TRUST: $14k → 12%CHATTANOOGA AREA FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $20k → 12%GHROW FOUNDATION INC: $27k → 6%CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $52 → 8%ASIA PACIFIC CAREER DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 11%BLUE RIBBON MOVEMENT TRUST: $4k → 12%COLLEGEDALE ACADEMY: $5k → 12%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $17k → 12%GHROW FOUNDATION INC: $26k → 6%OLNEY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $32k → 8%CHATTANOOGA AREA FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $15k → 12%GHROW FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 6%OLNEY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $28k → 8%COLLEGEDALE ACADEMY: $1k → 12%SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $11k → 12%GHROW FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 6%OLNEY ADVENTIST PREPATORY SCHOOL: $6k → 8%CHATANOOGA FOOD BANK: $1k → 12%GHROW FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 6%OLNEY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $4k → 8%OOLTEWAH SDA CHURCH: $95k → 12%SPENCERVILLE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $600 → 8%OOLTEWAH SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $34k → 12%OOLTEWAH SDA CHURCH: $25k → 12%OOLTEWAH ADVENTIST SCHOOL: $15k → 12%MISCELLANEOUS SMALL GRANTS: $4k → 12%MISCELLANEOUS SMALL GRANTS: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($56k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$53k · 4 grants
Hong Kong$3k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$603k · 11 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$603k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+18%

Still filing today

18%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $171k
  • TG
    The Ghrow Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +81% · 38% of their budget
  • OS
    OOLTEWAH SDA CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $120k

Funded once

  • OS
    OOLTEWAH SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $34k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $18k
  • OA
    OOLTEWAH ADVENTIST SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMY: $171,150 · OtherSHENANDOAH VALLEY ACADEMYOOLTEWAH SDA CHURCH: $120,035 · OtherOOLTEWAH SDA CHURCHOLNEY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $63,550 · OtherOLNEY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCHBLUE RIBBON MOVEMENT TRUST: $34,641 · OtherBLUE RIBBON MOVEMENT TRUSTOOLTEWAH SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $34,200 · OtherOOLTEWAH SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCHASIA PACIFIC CAREER DEVELOPMENT: $31,002 · OtherASIA PACIFIC CAREER DEVELOPMENTTAKOMA ACADEMY: $21,150 · Other+13 more: $92,542 · Other+13 moreThe Ghrow Foundation Inc: $124,520 · EducationThe Ghrow Foundation…Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $100 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC: $62 · Recreation & SportsCHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC: $52 · Environment
Other$568,270Education$124,520Food & Nutrition$3,000Health$100Recreation & Sports$62Environment$52

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Ghrow Foundation Inc: $124,520 over 6y, 38% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC: $62 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Ghrow Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sffc Foundation IncTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sffc Foundation Inc · Versacare Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph