Skip to content
Roy and Pearl Rogers Foundation Ua 12461 at a glance

· Private foundation

Roy and Pearl Rogers Foundation Ua 12461

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$16kHealth$8kPhilanthropy$6kReligion$3kMembership Benefit$2kRecreation & Sports$2kInternational$800Public Safety & Disaster$600Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
12
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTER MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
UNITED WAY OF ADDISON COUNTY$1,000
THE TAFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$550
FIRST UNITED METHODIST$500
WAKE FOREST BASEBALL EXCELLENCE FUND$475
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$400
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$250
LAFAYETTE COLLEGE$250
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$250
CHATHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION$200
MT HOPE CEMETERY$200
HEAD-ROYCE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$150
THE FIRST TEE$125
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$100
HOPE (Help Overcome Poverty's$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38k · 23 repeat orgs$875 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$38k
$300

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+31%

Still filing today

48%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $575 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ADDISON COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +10%
  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +28%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SM
    SANFORD MAINERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100 · revenue 0%
  • ES
    Elderly Services Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100 · revenue +120%
  • SA
    Sheldon Art Museum Archaeological and Historical Society Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100 · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
6
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Amherst College Trustees

Amherst college educates students of exceptional potential from all backgrounds so that they may seek value and advance knowledge, engage the world around them, and lead principled lives of consequence. amherst brings together the most…

Education
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Syracuse University; the most unlike its peers is Chatham Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TAFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $4,150 · OtherTHE TAFT SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDFIRST UNITED METHODIST: $3,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODISTHEAD-ROYCE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $2,275 · OtherHEAD-ROYCE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYMT HOPE CEMETERY: $1,200 · OtherMT HOPE CEMETERYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $1,200 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYTHE FIRST TEE: $950 · OtherHOPE (Help Overcome Poverty's: $800 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 · OtherJA VITELLI KAPPA ALPHA THETA: $600 · Other+5 more: $1,700 · Other+5 moreUNITED WAY OF ADDISON COUNTY INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ADDISON…CHATHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,300 · PhilanthropyCHATHAM EDUCATION FOU…President and Fellows of Middlebury College: $2,950 · EducationPresident and Fellow…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $1,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationLAFAYETTE COLLEGESYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $600 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $575 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSIT…PORTER MEDICAL CENTER: $6,000 · HealthPORTER MEDICAL CEN…+2 more: $400 · Health+2 moreSANFORD MAINERS INC: $100 · Recreation & SportsSheldon Art Museum Archaeological and Historical Society Inc: $100 · Arts & CultureTHE VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$17,975Philanthropy$7,300Education$7,125Health$6,400Recreation & Sports$100Arts & Culture$100Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF ADDISON COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPORTER MEDICAL CENTER: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $2,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $575 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health Services of Addison Cty Inc: $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAddison County Home Health Hospice Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANFORD MAINERS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElderly Services Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSheldon Art Museum Archaeological and Historical Society Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ADDISON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PORTER MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Services of Addison Cty Inc ↗
  • Who funds Addison County Home Health Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD MAINERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Elderly Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sheldon Art Museum Archaeological and Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Vermont Community FoundationVT19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roy and Pearl Rogers Foundation Ua 12461 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roy and Pearl Rogers Foundation Ua 12461. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Vermont River Conservancy Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Elderly Services Inc: 19% of income from government
  • United Way of Addison County Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Addison County Home Health Hospice Inc: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Porter Medical Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roy and Pearl Rogers Foundation Ua 12461’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home