Skip to content
Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time.

$6k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$470kHuman Services$145kRecreation & Sports$140kCommunity Improvement$85kCrime & Legal$61kFood & Nutrition$58kHealth$53kYouth Development$28kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,375
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC$6,375
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PARTNERS IN LEARNING CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$940k · 14 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$940k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+22%

Still filing today

79%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Community ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    ROWAN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $61k · revenue +16%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROWAN
    3× · 2019–2021 · $58k · revenue +183%
  • TH
    TERRIE HESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    4× · 2018–2021 · $51k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • RY
    ROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +129%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • SA
    SALISBURY ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rowan Economic Development Council

Promoting economic and industrial development in rowan county, north carolina

—
2
Rowan Idea Center Foundation
Education
3
Rowan Museum Inc

Collect, preserve, research, exhibit, and educate the public about the history of rowan county and piedmont north carolina through the use of its properties, programs and collections.

Arts & Culture
4
Rowan Public Library Foundation Inc

To provide monetary support to the rowan county public library.

Human Services
5
Robeson Health Care Corporation

Providing primary health care and professional counseling services to all indviduals who need it.

Health
6
Salisbury-Rowan Community Action Agency

Salisbury-rowan community action agency is committed to providing education, child care, and other services to the underprivileged residents of salisbury, north carolina and two surrounding counties.

Human Services
7
Rowan Arts Council Inc

To raise funds for cultural arts for arts & cultural organizations within rowan county. to grant out funds to arts & cultural organizations for the creative arts, advance arts education and development of the salisbury/rowan cultural…

Arts & Culture
8
Community Care Clinic of Rowan County Inc

Provides medical, dental and pharmaceutical care to uninsured or underserved rowan county residents using paid and volunteer medical professionals and skilled support staff.

Health
9
Rowan Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
10
Rowan County Youth Services Bureau Inc

Provide prevention & intervention services targeting at-risk youth in rowan county

—
11
Rowan County Literacy Council Inc

Improving the lives of adults, youth and families by enhancing literacy and life skills

Education
12
Rowan County United Way Inc

To lead the community by mobilizing resources making a lasting impact for those in need and shape a better future for everyone.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of Rowan County; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROWAN-SALISBURY SCHOOL SYSTEM: $377,450 · OtherROWAN-SALISBURY SCHOOL SYSTEMTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INC: $72,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INCROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA: $40,000 · OtherROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICATERRIE HESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $50,745 · OtherTERRIE HESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERGirls on the Run of the Greater Piedmont: $27,500 · Other+6 more: $71,499 · Other+6 moreBELL TOWER GREEN INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureBELL TOWER…ROWAN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $60,566 · Community ImprovementROWAN COU…DOWNTOWN SALISBURY INC: $14,700 · Community ImprovementDOWNTOWN …ROWAN GROWTH PARTNERS: $10,000 · Community ImprovementROWAN GRO…ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $34,000 · Human ServicesROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN LEARNING CHILD DEVELOP- MENT AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS OF ROWAN: $58,040 · Food & NutritionCATAWBA COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationROWAN PARTNERS FOR EDUCATION INC: $21,026 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ROWAN COUNTY: $10,000 · EducationAmerican Heart Association Inc: $42,875 · HealthCABARRUS PUBLIC HEALTH INTEREST: $10,000 · Health
Other$639,194Arts & Culture$100,000Community Improvement$85,266Human Services$65,000Food & Nutrition$58,040Education$56,026Health$52,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELL TOWER GREEN INC: $100,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ROWAN COUNTY NC INC: $72,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetROWAN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $60,566 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ROWAN: $58,040 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTERRIE HESS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $50,745 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $42,875 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $34,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGirls on the Run of the Greater Piedmont: $27,500 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetCATAWBA COLLEGE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROWAN PARTNERS FOR EDUCATION INC: $21,026 over 2y, 28% of budgetDOWNTOWN SALISBURY INC: $14,700 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSALISBURY ACADEMY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS COUNCIL OF ROWAN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCABARRUS PUBLIC HEALTH INTEREST: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetROWAN GROWTH PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ROWAN COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRUFTY-HOLMES SENIOR CENTER INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN LEARNING CHILD DEVELOP- MENT AND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Margaret C Woodson Fo…Novant Health IncFoundation for the Ca…The Cannon Foundation…The Hurley-Trammell F…Duke Energy FoundationMariam & Robert Hayes…Rowan County United W…Ketner Foundation IncMiles J Smith Family …The Wilson L Smith Fa…Joe L & Hester Sims F…
Margaret C Woodson Foundation IncNC34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Margaret C Woodson Foundation Inc · Novant Health Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Hurley-Trammell Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Mariam & Robert Hayes Charitable Trust · Rowan County United Way Inc · Ketner Foundation Inc · Miles J Smith Family Foundation · The Wilson L Smith Family Foundation the Smith Foundation · Joe L & Hester Sims Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rowan Regional Medical Center Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rowan Regional Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home