Loading…
· Private foundation
Roth Family Foundation
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$31k
Granted FY2024
26
Grants
7
Communities
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of Roth Family Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
hopejusticemuseumtemple emanu-el
2019
tempetemple emanu-eltheaterlawmuseum
2020
museum
2021
israelmuseum
2022
—
2023
temple shaarayshaaray tefilamuseum
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 26 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$530k
Total assets
Largest grants
- KOL AMI MITZVAH CORP$8,090
- CONGREGATION BETH ELOHIM$4,637
- TEMPLE SHAARAY TEFILA RABBI STEIN C$3,000
- MANHATTAN THEATER CLUB$3,000
- REGISTER HER PROJECT OF HOPEWELL FU$1,000
- TUCSON JEWISH MUSEUM HOLOCOST CTR$1,000
- TRUSTEES OF HAMILTON COLLEGE$1,000
- NO KID HUNGRY$1,000
- FRIENDS OF FORREST FOUNDATION AUTIS$1,000
- RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,000
- ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$500
- ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT$500
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SO AZ$500
- UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS$500
- AMERICARES$500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 37% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 59 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
59
50
Total granted
$137k
$22k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+77%
+46%
Still filing today
27%
22%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTRUSTEES OF HAMILTON COLLEGE8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +6%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE7× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +204%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUCSON6× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +127%
Funded once
- RTROUNDABOUT THEATERone grant, 2019 · $3k
- 9N92ND NYone grant, 2023 · $3k
- TBTEMPLE BETH ELOHEMone grant, 2018 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Children's Museum of Manhattan
Promoting literacy, early childhood education, health, and creativity.
Arts & Culture
2
Witness Inc
Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…
International
3
Children's Museum of Oak Park
To spark curiosity in all children through positive, play-based learning experiences.
Arts & Culture
4
New York School of Interior Design
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Education
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc
To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.
Health
6
National Council of Jewish Women
Inspired by jewish values, the national council of jewish women is a grassroots organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children, and families, and by safeguarding…
Community Improvement
7
American Jewish World Service Inc
We work to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean.
International
8
Arizona Family Health Partnership
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
—
9
Residential Opportunities Inc
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
Human Services
10
Phoenix Art Museum
World class museum- see schedule o for full mission.phoenix art museum is a vibrant destination connecting people to great art from around the world to enrich their lives and communities.
Arts & Culture
11
Arbor Research Collaborative for
To improve patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice.
Health
12
Accessmatters
Protect, expand & enhance equitable access to sexual & reproductive health care & info for all
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Autism Speaks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Museum of Modern Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
11%
5,139/45,381
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
29 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$146,514Education$7,300Housing & Shelter$4,283Human Services$3,210Health$2,500Community Improvement$2,200Arts & Culture$2,155
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Arizona Community FoundationAZ18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Community Foundation For · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern · Jewish Community Foundation Of · Baird Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Chicago Community Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Roth Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 463882856 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ANGEL HEART PAJAMA PROJECT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Roth Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Roth Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines