Skip to content
Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc

The foundation is an organization established within rotary district 6000 for the receipt of charitable contributions for humanitarian and educational projects carried out by district rotarians and rotary clubs within and outside the united states.

$119k
Granted FY2019
6
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Rotary Foundation Of Rotary International, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $84k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
11
’18
5
’19
4
’20
4
’21
1
’22
1
’23
1
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$396kCommunity Improvement$308kHealth$108kHousing & Shelter$92kFood & Nutrition$51kArts & Culture$46kReligion$40kPhilanthropy$31kOther$0
02FY2019 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $83,617, the rows itemized in this filing. The $119,289 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $35,672 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
$14,656
Median grant
3
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Iowa Children's Museum$25,536
Rotary Club of West Liberty$16,350
The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International$14,656
Rotary Club of Iowa City Noon$11,960
Rotary Club of Oskaloosa$10,115
Paradise Rotary Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Casa Colibri: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $37k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

India$19k · 51% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO HELP SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS MISSION.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$12k · 32% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO HELP SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS MISSION.

Ukraine$6k · 16% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO HELP SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS MISSION.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$510k · 9 repeat orgs$265k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2019, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$510k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $54k · revenue +12%
  • TI
    THE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    2× · 2018–2019 · $36k · revenue +5%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6000 INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $28k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • CC
    CASA COLIBRI
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -23%
  • PS
    PREUCIL SCHOOL OF MUSICgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

—
2
Rotary International Dublin Am Rotary Club

Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.

—
3
Rotary International

to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.

—
4
Rotary International

Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…

—
5
Rotary International Rotary Club of Watertown Wi

Community service

—
6
Rotary International Winona Rotary Club

Encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.

—
7
Rotary International Ste Genevieve Rotary Club

To provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

—
8
Rotary International

Service club

—
9
Rotary International Yuma Foothills Rotary

To provide service to others, promote high ethical standards, and to advance world understanding, goodwill and peace.

—
10
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Rotary International

Rotary international has more than 45,000 members worldwide to work together to promote peace, fight disease, provide clean water, save mothers and children, support education, grow local economies, and protect the environment.

—
12
Rotary International Menomonie Rotary

A fellowship of individuals who are focused on supporting their community and building bridges between nations.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinton Rotary Club; the most unlike its peers is Preucil School of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $372,700 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNAT…CLUBFOOT SOLUTIONS: $33,769 · InternationalCLUBFOOT SOLUTIONSRotary Club of Fort Madison: $48,469 · OtherRotary Club of Fort MadisonFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHOSKALOOSA ROTARY CHAPTER OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $31,356 · OtherOSKALOOSA ROTARY CHAPTER OF R…ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6000 INC: $27,500 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT…ROTARY CLUB OF WEST LIBERTY IOWA: $25,654 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF WEST LIBERTY I…ROTARY INTERNATIONAL IOWA CITY: $20,510 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL IOWA CIT…Rotary Club of Iowa City Noon: $15,176 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL BOONE ROTARY CLUB: $14,500 · OtherRotary Club of Oskaloosa: $12,383 · Other+10 more: $66,703 · Other+10 moreROTARY DISTRICT 6000 HUMANITARIAN AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $209,625 · Community ImprovementROTARY DISTRICT 6000…GOSERV GLOBAL INC: $92,209 · Public Safety & DisasterGOSERV GL…STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $53,552 · EducationTHE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $35,536 · Arts & CulturePREUCIL SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $38,687 · Food & Nutrition
International$406,469Other$302,251Community Improvement$209,625Public Safety & Disaster$92,209Education$53,552Arts & Culture$45,536Food & Nutrition$38,687

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $372,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROTARY DISTRICT 6000 HUMANITARIAN AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $209,625 over 2y, 34% of budgetGOSERV GLOBAL INC: $92,209 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $53,552 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF IOWA: $38,687 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $35,536 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCLUBFOOT SOLUTIONS: $33,769 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetOSKALOOSA ROTARY CHAPTER OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $31,356 over 3y, 21% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6000 INC: $27,500 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF WEST LIBERTY IOWA: $25,654 over 4y, 37% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL BOONE ROTARY CLUB: $14,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetCASA COLIBRI: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPREUCIL SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCLINTON ROTARY CLUB: $7,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL NEVADA ROTARY CLUB: $7,500 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Rotary Club of West Des Moines Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 29% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL OTTUMWA ROTARY CLUB: $6,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,875 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARADISE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Johnson CountyIA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Johnson County · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home