· Public charity
Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc
The foundation is an organization established within rotary district 6000 for the receipt of charitable contributions for humanitarian and educational projects carried out by district rotarians and rotary clubs within and outside the united states.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Rotary Foundation Of Rotary International, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $84k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $83,617 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $119,289 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $35,672 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Iowa Children's Museum | $25,536 |
| Rotary Club of West Liberty | $16,350 |
| The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International | $14,656 |
| Rotary Club of Iowa City Noon | $11,960 |
| Rotary Club of Oskaloosa | $10,115 |
| Paradise Rotary Foundation | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $37k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: TO HELP SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS MISSION.
Stated purpose: TO HELP SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS MISSION.
Stated purpose: TO HELP SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS MISSION.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 25% of Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2019, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SUSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $54k · revenue +12%
- TITHE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM2× · 2018–2019 · $36k · revenue +5%
- RIROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6000 INC2× · 2018–2020 · $28k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $40k
- CCCASA COLIBRIone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -23%
- PSPREUCIL SCHOOL OF MUSICgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…
Raising funds to provide community service at home and throughout the world.
to provide community as well as worlwide assistance to those in need.
Rotary club of superior is a service organization located in superior, wi and chartered under rotary international. the club members donate hundreds of hours annually to different projects and fundraisers in the community and contribute…
Community service
Encourage and foster the ideal of service as a basis of worthy enterprise.
To provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.
Service club
To provide service to others, promote high ethical standards, and to advance world understanding, goodwill and peace.
Rotary international has more than 45,000 members worldwide to work together to promote peace, fight disease, provide clean water, save mothers and children, support education, grow local economies, and protect the environment.
A fellowship of individuals who are focused on supporting their community and building bridges between nations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Clinton Rotary Club and the most unlike its peers is Preucil School of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 6000 HUMANITARIAN AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOSERV GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds THE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CLUBFOOT SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds OSKALOOSA ROTARY CHAPTER OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 6000 INC ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF WEST LIBERTY IOWA ↗
- Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL IOWA CITY ↗
- Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL BOONE ROTARY CLUB ↗
- Who funds CASA COLIBRI ↗
- Who funds PREUCIL SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds CLINTON ROTARY CLUB ↗
- Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL NEVADA ROTARY CLUB ↗
- Who funds The Rotary Club of West Des Moines Inc ↗
- Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL OTTUMWA ROTARY CLUB ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Iowa City AM Rotary Club ↗
- Who funds PARADISE ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Johnson County · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rotary District 6000 Humanitarian and Educational Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.