Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Rotary Club 29 Foundation

Rotary Club 29 Foundation was established for the purpose of providing support for the philanthropic projects of the Rotary Club of Oklahoma City.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

International$608kHuman Services$256kEducation$190kReligion$112kPublic Safety & Disaster$108kAnimals$86kYouth Development$30kCommunity Improvement$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $125,987 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $193,040 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $67,053 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wings Special Needs Community$85,245
Oklahoma City Public Schools Founda$15,000
Rotary District 6710 Foundation$10,000
Donors Choose$9,792
Rotary Zones 3334 Foundation$5,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sunbeam Family Services: $37k → 16%Calm Waters Center for Children & F: $19k → 16%Wings Special Needs Community: $85k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
KY
AZ
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Rotary Club 29 Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 53% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Rotary Club 29 Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$254k · 4 repeat orgs$625k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
19

Total granted

$254k
$514k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $123k · revenue +26%
  • RI
    RESTOREOKC INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $112k · revenue +81%
  • SU
    SHELTERBOX USA INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Dragonfly Home Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $97k · revenue 0%
  • OZ
    OKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $86k · revenue +55%
  • RF
    RAINBOW FLEET INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rotary International

Rotary is an organization of business and professional leaders united worldwide who provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world. The main objective of…

2
Rotary Club of Oklahoma City

To foster and promote the ideals of service and ethical standards in personal, business and community life and promote international understanding through fellowship and to encourage acquaintance as an opportunity for service.

3
Rotary International Georgetown Tx

The rotary international organization provides service in the community, in the workplace, and throughout the world. rotarians develop community service projects that address many of today's most critical issues, such as children at risk,…

4
Rotary Club of Seattle

The rotary club of seattle creates strong relationships, increases understanding, and serves critical community needs.

5
Rotary Club of Cincinnati

To encourage and foster ideals of service of its members for the community.

6
Kansas City Rotary Foundation

Making grants to charitable and educational organizations engaged in youth activities

7
Roswell Rotary Foundation

The general purpose of the foundation's charitable efforts is to provide support to locally based charitable organizations, designed to provide benevolence and aid the quality of life within the city of roswell and adjacent areas. the…

Philanthropy
8
Oregon Rotary Club Foundation Inc

Providing educational scholarships & grants

Education
9
Rotary International

Rotary international provides service to others, promotes integrity, and advances world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

10
Rotary Foundation of Washington Dc
Community Improvement
11
Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Rotary Club of Fresno

The Rotary Club of Fresno's mission is to establish friendships, create networking opportunities and positively impact lives locally and around the world.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoreokc Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Dragonfly Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Developmental Disabilities …Education Equity LeadershipMuslim Community Organizati…Homeless Services & ShelterRotary Club FoundationsPublic School District Foun…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORLD VISION INC — $530,750 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC — $66,000 · InternationalASSIST INTERNATIONAL INCTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $49,000 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $123,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY PU…RAINBOW FLEET INC — $70,000 · EducationRAINBOW FLEET IN…PALO ALTO ROTARY CLUB ANNUAL CHARITIES INC — $10,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG — $9,792 · Education+1 more — $5,950 · EducationThe Dragonfly Home Inc — $96,803 · OtherThe Dragonfly Ho…ST LUKES UNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION INC OF OKLAHOMA CITY OK — $15,750 · OtherST LUKES UNITED …ROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5750 — $10,000 · OtherRotary Club of Sacramento Foundatio — $10,000 · OtherPHOENIX ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES — $9,000 · OtherSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherROTARY DISTRICT 671 FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherTHE GENESIS PROJECT — $18,073 · OtherTHE GENESIS PROJ…Sammamish Rotary Foundation — $10,000 · Other+5 more — $25,600 · Other+5 moreWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC — $85,245 · Human ServicesWINGS SPECI…SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $37,334 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAM…CALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $18,620 · Human ServicesCALM WATERS…SHELTERBOX USA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX …RESTOREOKC INC — $111,940 · ReligionOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $85,795 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $30,000 · Youth Development
International$645,750Education$218,742Other$215,226Human Services$151,199Religion$111,940Animals$85,795Youth Development$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC — $530,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $123,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC — $111,940 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc — $96,803 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $85,795 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetRAINBOW FLEET INC — $70,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetASSIST INTERNATIONAL INC — $66,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $49,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC — $37,334 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE — $30,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC — $18,620 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE GENESIS PROJECT — $18,073 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPALO ALTO ROTARY CLUB ANNUAL CHARITIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSammamish Rotary Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT 5750 — $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $9,792 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX ROTARY CLUB CHARITIES — $9,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetROTARY ZONES 33-34 FOUNDATION — $5,950 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LIFESHARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBELLEVUE ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS OKLA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK29.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Wegener Foundation Inc · Harris Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rotary Club 29 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 52%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc52% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph