How much did ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGR grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

musicmusicalartafterdancedevelopenvironmental

2022

memory marymusicartaftermusicaldevelopdance

2023

scholarshipeducationalartsmusicenvironmentalmusicaleducation

2024

scholarshipmusicenvironmentalaftermusicalartarts education

2025

learningteenenvironmental educationmusicafterarts educationyouth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

PHILADANCO$5,000
Rock to the Future$5,000
Norris Square Neighborhood Projects$5,000
The Unscripted Project$5,000
Metropolitan Ballet Company$5,000
The Clay Studio$5,000
PYO Music Institute$5,000
Awbury Arboretum$5,000
Spiral Q Puppet Theater$5,000
1812 Productions$5,000
Art Well$5,000
Dancing Classrooms Philly$5,000
Taller Puertorriqueno$5,000
Fresh Artists$5,000
Historic Fair Hill$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGR’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 77% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGRlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 23% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 50 repeat orgs$598k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.0M

$567k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%

+19%

Still filing today

68%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WP
West Park Cultural Center
5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +88%
RT
Rock to the Future
5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +185%
AS
Art Sphere
5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +154%

Funded once

SA
SEE ATTACHED STATEMENT
one grant, 2020 · $182k
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
one grant, 2022 · $92k
BU
Boston University
one grant, 2022 · $92k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Opera Philadelphia

Opera philadelphia is committed to embracing innovation and developing opera for the 21st century.

Arts & Culture

Philadelphia Performing Arts

To educate each child according to age and development, so that learning and growth are united; to integrate the developing mind and body of the child with academics and the performing arts to ensure each child's excellence in core and…

Education

Philadelphia Dance Projects

To be an advocate for dance in philadelphia by presenting stimulating performances, workshops, classes, dialogs and forums for artists, aspiring artists, students, and a broad-based audience.

Arts & Culture

Young Playwrights Theater

Young Playwrights Theater (YPT) is committed to using theater & writing to foster dialogue, arts education, literacy & conflict resolution in communities.

Arts & Culture

The Pennsylvania Ballet Association

To cultivate an enduring appreciation for dance through world class performances

Arts & Culture

Journey Arts

Boldly leverage the power of the performing arts to catalyze social change, challenge bias, and create spaces for dialogue and understanding by presenting culturally diverse voices that celebrate and affirm our shared humanity.

Arts & Culture

Philadelphia Contemporary

We connect the people and places of philadelphia through art and partnership.

Human Services

Developing Artists Theaters Company Inc

Developing Artists (DA) challenges teens to combine rigorous performing arts training with ensemble based philosophy to create original work that inspires social change.

Arts & Culture

Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council

By sharing resources and fostering meaningful relationships that strengthen the region's creative community, the greater pittsburgh arts council builds a more resourced, connected, and informed arts sector, empowering artists and arts…

Arts & Culture

Pennsylvania College of Art & Design

Pennsylvania college of art & design is a professional art college offering a bfa degree, certificates, credentials, and curricula that enable students of all ages to pursue art as their life's work.

Education

Quantum Theatre Inc

Quantum theatre creates adventurous, environmental productions of plays all over the city of pittsburgh. original works, contemporary international plays, or updated classics are brought intimately close in settings like groves of trees,…

Arts & Culture

The Bronx Council On the Arts

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and builds strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Play on Philly and the most unlike its peers is The Clay Studio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/42

the rest of the field

14%

1,344/9,554

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

41/42

Grantees still filing

33/42

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$963,800Arts & Culture$364,000Education$130,100Environment$98,000Public Benefit$25,000Human Services$21,000Community Improvement$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Henrietta Tower Wurts MemorialPA63× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial · The Philadelphia Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · The William Penn Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Ludwick Fdn · Connelly Foundation · The Allen Hilles Fund · Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert · Sheila Fortune Foundation Inc · Union Benevolent Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Art Sphere.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~41 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232994202 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Art Sphere, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 41 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Rosenlund Family Foundation Inv Mgr?

Find your warmest path to Rosenlund Family Foundation Inv Mgr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rosenlund Family Foundation Inv Mgr?

More from the funding graph

ROSENLUND FAMILY FOUNDATION INV MGR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

42 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rosenlund Family Foundation Inv Mgr?

More from the funding graph